Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Image Anal. 2014 Mar 29;18(4):684–698. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2014.03.001

Table 6.

Comparison of the scores for SGS subjects using three different methods with the clinical diagnosis based on the Myer-Cotton grading system.

Patient Id Surgery Myer-Cotton WPB FB WFB
SGS03 Pre 80-90% 86.0% 85.6% 85.6%
SGS07 Pre 85% 77.4% 74.5% 74.5%
SGS11 Pre 50% 59.2% 54.8% 54.8%
SGS12 Pre 70% 70% 70% 68.7%
SGS13 Pre 60-70% 9.9% 37.8% 34.0%
SGS18 Pre 60-70% 69.2% 69.2% 68.8%
SGS03_V3 Post 0% 0.3% 1.1% 0%
SGS05 Post 0% 0% 0% 0%
SGS06 Post 40-50% 0% 35.1% 13.9%
SGS08 Post 0% 0% 0% 0%
SGS09 Post 50% 19.6% 59.1% 57.8%
SGS10 Post grade I 0% 39.9% 27.6%
SGS14 Post 50% 0% 26.1% 0%
SGS17 Post 0% 16.3% 0% 0%
SGS07_V3 Post 30% 14.5% 9.3% 9.3%
SGS04_V3 Post grade I: 10% 0% 5.6% 0%
SGS01_V3 Post 15-20% 31.4% 30.2% 29.6%

Notes: Weighted point-wise boxplots (WPB), functional boxplots (FB), weighted functional boxplots (WFB). The scores are converted based on the correspondence between our scoring system and the Myer-Cotton system in Section 8.2.1. Grade I represents an obstruction within (0% - 50%].