Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2014 May 21;23(4):242–252. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2013.786937

Table 3.

Logistic Regression Analysis Predicting Substance Use of Native Hawaiian Youth in the Past 4 Weeks

Alcohol (N = 188) Cigarettes (N = 190) Marijuana (N = 191) “Hard Drugs” (N = 189) Any Substance Use (N = 191)
Predictors B OR B OR B OR B OR B OR
Peer Pressure 0.58 (0.57) 1.78 1.46** (0.48) 4.30 0.11 (0.48) 1.12 0.88 (0.75) 2.41 0.56 (0.56) 1.75
Family Offers/Context 2.85** (0.79) 17.28 1.00* (0.45) 2.73 1.25* (0.49) 3.49 0.97 (0.58) 2.65 3.08** (0.82) 21.68
Unanticipated Drug Offers 1.08 (0.63) 2.94 -0.96 (0.53) 0.38 1.22* (0.54) 3.39 -0.35 (0.70) 0.71 0.82 (0.57) 2.28
Age 0.39 (0.25) 1.48 0.06 (0.31) 1.06 0.55 (0.35) 1.73 0.70 (0.65) 2.01 0.43 (0.24) 1.54
Federal Lunch Participation -0.09 (0.48) 0.91 0.40 (0.61) 1.50 0.83 (0.69) 2.30 -0.35 (0.95) 0.71 -0.02 (0.46) 0.98
Two-Parent Household -0.48 (0.43) 0.62 0.12 (0.51) 1.13 -0.57 (0.56) 0.57 1.21 (1.10) 3.35 -0.39 (0.42) 0.68
Gender (Male) 0.61 (0.43) 1.84 -0.02 (0.53) 0.98 0.60 (0.57) 1.82 1.27 (1.10) 3.56 0.72 (0.42) 2.05
Intercept -5.22 -3.19 -9.31 -13.62 -5.67
χ 2 77.03 34.85 50.40 16.92 76.08
df 7 7 7 7 7
Nagelkerke R2 0.47 0.30 0.41 0.32 0.45

Note: Standard errors are in parentheses

*

p < .05

**

p < .01

***p < .001