Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2006 Nov 11;20(0):437–448. doi: 10.1007/s10822-006-9061-3

Table 1.

Distance constraints for the various active state models. Constraints that were used to derive each model are shaded in the respective column

derived for residues involved change R0 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5
RHO TM1/TM7-H8 (1.60/7.53) increase
RHO TM1/TM7-H8 (1.60/7.57) increase
RHO TM1/TM7-H8 (1.56-1.60/7.59) ~
MC4R TM2/TM3 (2.60/3.28) 6.5<>8.5
MC4R TM2/TM3 (2.64/3.25) 6.5<>8.5
RHO TM3/TM5 (3.51/5.57) increase
RHO TM3/TM5 (3.51/5.60) decrease
RHO TM3/TM5 (3.53/5.57) increase
RHO TM3/TM5 (3.53/6.30) decrease
RHO TM3/TM6 (3.49-52/6.30-35) increase
NK1, β2ar TM3/TM7 (3.32/7.39) 6.5<>8.5
RHO TM5/TM6 (5.33-5.39/6.59) decrease
Mm3 mACHR TM5/TM6 (5.62/6.34-6.36) decrease
β2ar TM5/TM6 (5.63/6.27) decrease
Ste2p TM5/TM6 (5.30/6.61) <10
RHO various various
HHS Vulnerability Disclosure