Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Pediatr. 2012 Dec 20;162(5):906–11.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.060

Table V.

Association between birth weight quintiles and CIMT: sensitivity analyses

Birth weight quintiles Excluding potential outliers,*, n = 637
Children with birth record data on gestational age,, n = 637
Normal weight defined by WHO growth charts,, § n = 517
CIMTd 95% CI P value CIMTd 95% CI P value CIMTd 95% CI P value
1: 709–3005 g 0.0056 −0.0037 to 0.0150 .24 0.0057 −0.0050 to 0.0164 .29 0.0089 −0.0037 to 0.0215 .17
2: 3010–3317 g 0.0066 −0.0026 to 0.0157 .16 −0.0007 −0.0112 to 0.0097 .89 0.0015 −0.0088 to 0.0119 .77
3: 3320–3544 g Ref. Ref. Ref.
4: 3545–3830 g 0.0092 0.0001–0.0183 .05 0.0053 −0.0051 to 0.0156 .32 0.0055 −0.0047 to 0.0157 .29
5: 3840–5216 g 0.0161 0.0070–0.0253 <.01 0.0113 0.0009–0.0218 .03 0.0135 −0.0022 to 0.0291 .09

CIMTd, difference in carotid intima-media thickness; WHO, World Health Organization.

*

Excluding residuals >2 or <−2.

Adjusted for child’s age at CIMT scan, sex, BMI, systolic blood pressure, asthma status, race/ethnicity, delivery mode, maternal pregnancy complications, income, and study area.

Sample excluding the 33 children without data on gestational age from birth records.

§

WHO growth charts: sex-specific birth weight of healthy newborns.