Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mem Cognit. 2014 May;42(4):622–638. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0377-7

Table 1.

Model Parameters

Parameter Purpose Value
Encoding
Base linking rate /s γ Rate of link formation between active buffer items .074/s
Direct link strength,
 Forward
μ Strength of direct link from one perceived item to the next .10
Direct link strength,
 Reverse
ν Strength of direct link from one perceived item to the previous 0
Retrieval
Strong link bias α Non-linearity in transfer function between link strength and transition probability. 3.96
Buffer recall
 preference
β Addition to link strengths to preference retrieval of items currently maintained
in buffer
0.19
Buffer
Base disruption:
 coefficient
χ Probability that items in buffer will be lost upon presentation of new item – the
realization of the effortful hypothesis.
.001
Exponent λ P(disruption with occupancy = k) = χ kλ. 3.84
Base disruption
 during recall
φ Probability of item loss from buffer during recall (c.f. output interference) .002
Masked buffer
 disruption
ξ Additional disruption probability when new item is masked .21
Masked buffer
 rejection
ζ Probability that a masked item will not be stored in the buffer .30
Disruption
 persistence
ρ Multiplier for successively attenuating the disruption probability applied to the
1st and 2nd words following the masked position
.45
Buffer potentiation
 rate
κ Reduction in disruption probability, accumulated as an item remains in buffer —
reflects synaptic potentiation of afferents to neurons representing items.
.002
Extra unidirectional
 direct link
η Added direct link from current buffer items to current entrant, reflecting the
causal bias in Hebbian plasticity. (c.f. Miller & Wingfield 2010).
.09

Note. All simulation results presented herein are from a model defined by the parameters listed in the table above, which were fit to the 1s behavioral data.