Skip to main content
. 2011 Sep 13;2(3):249–270. doi: 10.3390/jfb2030249

Table 3.

Summary of different viral vectors used in inner ear gene therapy.

Vector Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
Adeno virus
  • 1)

    Transfect a wide variety of cell types in the inner ear including spiral ganglions, outer hair cells, spiral ligament, stria vascularis, and mesenchymal cells in both auditory and vestibular systems.

  • 2)

    Can produce high titer values that allow injection of small dose volumes for gene therap.

  • 3)

    Transgene expression up to 3 weeks can be achieved. The short duration of gene expression is ideal for hair cell regeneration because prolonged Math1 expression can produce too many ectopic hair cellsand compromise hearing.

  • 4)

    Effective in delivering Math1 gene to regenerate hair cells and Bcl-2 to protect hair cells from damage.

  • 5)

    Allows insertion of large DNA segments. Recombinant forms can take up to 30kb foreign DNA.

  • 6)

    Infects dividing and non-dividing cells with very high transduction efficiencies, both in vitro and in vivo.

  • 7)

    Widely researched in clinical studies in both animals and humans, giving a better ability to tackle clinical complications that can arise.

  • 1)

    Evokes a strong host immune response.

  • 2)

    Does not offer long term gene expression.

  • 3)

    Entry of the viral vectors is largely dependent on a host receptor called the coxsackie virus receptor (CAR).

[49,51, 82,83,84,87,88]
Adeno-associated Virus
  • 1)

    Effectively transfect most inner ear cell types in vivo. Studies show transgene expression in cochlear blood vessels, nerve fibers and spiral limbus cells.

  • 2)

    Effective in targeting stria vascularis and delivering tropic factors like NT-3, BDNF, VEGF and FGF.

  • 3)

    Transgene expression can occur up to 24 weeks in vivo.

  • 4)

    Non-toxic to inner ear cells and evokes low immune response.5) Lacks pathogenicity and has never been associated with any known human disease making them suitable for clinical applications.

  • 1)

    Only effective with in vivo inner ear gene therapy.

  • 2)

    Successful transgene expression in vivo depends on route of vector administration, limited to only direct injection of vector.

  • 3)

    Previous studies haveshown possible dissemination of vector from target tissue.

  • 4)

    Offers only a limited payload capacity owing to its small size.

  • 5)

    Risk of insertional mutagenesis.

  • 6)

    No substantial clinical experience.

  • 7)

    Vector entry in to host largely depends on heparin sulfate receptor.

[76,89,90,91,92]
Herpes Simplex Virus
  • 1)

    Effectively known to target non-dividing cells, specific to nerve cells, spiral ganglion, vestibular ganglion and mesenchymal cells in mice and guinea pigs.

  • 2)

    Newer recombinant vectors offer stable and long term gene expression of up to 8 weeks.

  • 3)

    Can take large DNA fragments.

  • 1)

    Evokes a strong immune response.

  • 2)

    Transfection is limited only to non-dividing neuronal cells.

  • 3)

    Large size of the virusmakes it difficult tomanipulate.

  • 4)

    The virus does not integrate into the host genome; hence gene expression can be unstable.

  • 5)

    Difficult to produce high titer values and requires injection of high vector volumes.

  • 6)

    No substantial clinical experience.

[84,85,93]
Lentivirus
  • 1)

    Transfect both dividing and non-dividing cells, including stem cells that are very difficult to transfect.

  • 2)

    Effectively transduce spiral ganglion neurons and supporting cell in vitro.

  • 3)

    Studies indicate transgene expression in perilymphatic space for up to 2 weeks.

  • 1)

    Limited to use in production of genes only in the perilymph.

  • 2)

    Limited dissemination of vector and not suitable for sensory cell transduction.

  • 3)

    Failure to transduce cells in the sensory epithelium in vivo.

  • 4)

    Can randomly integrate into host chromosome and capable of generating a replication competent virus.

  • 5)

    No clinical experience and safety concern arise from human immune deficiency virus origin.

[86,94]