Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 2013 Sep 25;68(1):145–161. doi: 10.1007/s00265-013-1631-5

Table 2.

Results of repeated-measures ANOVAs comparing control and immigrant birds in the Immigrant Transfer Phase for (1) behavior (PCA-rotated factors one and two), (2) FGM, and (3) The level of call convergence using Mahalanobis distances

Variable Control X ±SE Transfer X±SE Subject (Trt)
Treatment
Time period
Trt×Time period
F statistic P value F statistic P value F statistic P value F statistic P value
Behavior PCA factor one –0.10±0.31 0.13±0.34 0.747,7 0.65 0.251,7 0.63 0.661,7 0.44 0.081,7 0.78
Behavior PCA factor two –0.19±0.29 0.24±0.33 1.457,7 0.32 0.971,7 0.36 6.491,7 0.04 0.071,7 0.79
FGM 94.5±11.2 100.7±12.5 2.97,7 0.08 0.131.7 0.72 0.191,7 0.67 0.121,7 0.73
Call convergence 95.5±89.5 285.9±103.4 1.035,5 0.48 1.931,5 0.22 4.351,5 0.09 2.781,5 0.16

For FGM, we used a percentage of change from the baseline values (FGM value from week 19 pre-transfer) rather than the raw values. The time period for behavior and FGM included two time periods: weeks 1–2 and weeks 7–8. For vocal convergence, we divided week into two time periods: baseline and post-convergence