Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 2.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2013 Dec 18;505(7481):43–49. doi: 10.1038/nature12886

Table 1.

Dating for Branch Shortening and Population Splits

Event As % of human-chimp divergence Absolute date calibration #1 in kya (μ= 1 × 10−9/bp/year) Absolute date calibration #2 in kya (μ= 0.5 × 10−9/bp/year) Supplement
Altai Neandertal Branch Shortening 0.99% – 1.05% 64–68 129–136 SI 6b
Denisova Branch Shortening 0.77% – 0.84% 50–54 100–109 SI 6b
San-West African split 0.66% – 1.00% 43–65 86–130 SI 12
Introgressing Neandertal – Altai split 0.58% – 0.88% 38–57 77–114 SI 13
Introgressing Denisovan – Denisovan split 2.12% – 3.10% 138–202 276–403 SI 13
Neandertal-Denisova split* 2.93% – 3.64% 190–236 381–473 SI 12
Archaic-African split* 4.23% – 5.89% 275–383 550–765 SI 12
Unknown archaic split 7.90% – 31.12% 450–2027 900–4054 SI 16a,b

This table gives date ranges for two calibrations. The first assumes human-chimpanzee divergence of 6.5 million years and 1.30% for human-chimp divergence, or a mutation rate of 1 x 10−9/bp/year1,2,12. The second is based on direct measurement of per generation mutation rates 1517, corresponding to a mutation rate of 0.5 × 10−9/bp/year or 13 million years ago for human-chimpanzee divergence, and may fit better with some aspects of the fossil record45,46. Intervals give the range of values over tested human genomes for branch shortening; lowest and highest estimate for two or three methods for San-West African, Neandertal-Denisova, Neandertal-African and Denisova-African split; jackknife confidence interval over introgressed chunks for the Introgressing-Archaic - Archaic splits; and a union of the jackknife confidence interval in SI 16a and the 95% highest posterior density in SI 16b for the unknown-archaic split.

*

The indicated values are corrected for branch shortening where relevant as described in the supplementary notes.