Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 8;139(2):488–500. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfu041

TABLE 3. Relative Potency Factors (RPFs)a and Rank Order of Potency.

Most potent graphic file with name kfu041ufig1.jpg Least potent
AFC/106 spleen cells:
Chemical TCDD TBDF 4PeBDF 1PeBDF TCDF 4PeCDF 1PeCDF
ED50 0.34 3.87 8.17 42.79 55.3 59.96 696.4
RPF 1.0 0.09 0.04 0.008 0.006 0.006 0.0005
AFC/Spleen:
Chemical TCDD TBDF 4PeBDF TCDF 4PeCDF 1PeBDF 1PeCDF
ED50 0.32 3.61 6.07 34.12 35.92 45.63 573.5
RPF 1.0 0.088 0.052 0.009 0.009 0.007 0.0006
Serum IgM antibody titer to SRBCs:
Chemical TCDD 4PeBDF TBDF 4PeCDF TCDF 1PeBDF 1PeCDF
ED50 1.87 16.89 19.31 126.3 180.2 181.1 529.0
RPF 1.0 0.110 0.097 0.015 0.010 0.010 0.004
Cyp1a1 expression:
Chemical TCDD TBDF 4PeBDF 1PeBDF TCDF 4PeCDF 1PeCDF
ED50 1.22 13.39 21.84 83.74 128.6 129.2 169.1
RPF 1.0 0.091 0.056 0.015 0.010 0.009 0.007
Cyp1a2 expression:
Chemical TCDD TBDF 4PeBDF TCDF 1PeBDF 4PeCDF 1PeCDF
ED50 2.43 23.17 33.06 138.7 161.5 184.5 189.8
RPF 1.0 0.11 0.074 0.018 0.015 0.013 0.013

Note. TriBDD was not included in the RPF assessment due to a lack of a statistically significant effect. DBDCDD was not included in the RPF assessment due to a nonmonotonic dose response.

aRelative potency factors were calculated as the ED50 (Inline graphicg/kg) value (from the Hill model) for TCDD/ED50 (Inline graphicg/kg) value for the test chemical.