Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 11;135(12):3781–3798. doi: 10.1093/brain/aws276

Table 1.

Characteristics and performance of the preterm groups with and without language impairment

Characteristics and performance Unimpaired language (n = 31) Impaired language (n = 19) Statistical comparison
Total Language Score (CELF-3UK) 102 (10) 68 (10) t(48) = 11.9, P < 0.0001*
Verbal IQ 100 (10) 77 (9) t(48) = 8.3, P < 0.0001
Non-verbal IQ 100 (14) 81 (13) t(48) = 4.6, P < 0.0001
Demographics
    Age (years) 16.2 (1.2) 16.1 (1.6) t(48) = 0.3, P = 0.767
    Sex ratio (male:female) 11:20 8:11 χ2(1, n = 50) = 0.2, P = 0.431
    Maternal education (years) 2.5 (3.3) 2.1 (3.2) t(48) = 0.4, P = 0.714
    Abnormal MRI at follow-up, n (%) 16 (52) 17 (89) χ2(1, n = 50) = 4.5, P = 0.032
    Abnormal/suspicious neurological outcome, n (%) 7 (23) 10 (53) χ2 (2, n = 50) = 4.7, P = 0.031
Perinatal and developmental variables
    Cranial ultrasound lesion, n (%) χ2 (2, n = 50) = 1.7, P = 0.430
        Minor 11 (35) 6 (32)
        Major 5 (16) 6 (32)
    Gestation (weeks) 28 (2) 26 (2) t(48) = 3.0, P = 0.004
    Birth weight (g) 1203 (420) 883 (210) t(48) = 3.6, P = 0.001
    Development quotient at 1 year 119 (16) 110 (12) t(46) = 2.1, P = 0.041
    History of speech and/or language delay, n (%) 6 (19) 13 (68) χ2(1, n = 50) = 6.0, P = 0.014
School performance and behaviour
    Total behavioural score 7.4 (5.7) 12.0 (3.6) t(41) = 2.9, P = 0.007
    Additional help at school, n (%) 2 (7) 15 (75) χ2 (1, n = 50) = 28.0, P < 0.0001
    School leavers exam passes (grades A–C) 8 (3) 2 (2) t(38) = 6.7, P < 0.0001*

Table displays mean values and standard deviation in parenthesis unless otherwise stated. Values in bold are significant.

* Significantly different after controlling for non-verbal IQ (P < 0.0001).