. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 23.

Published in final edited form as: Arch Intern Med. 2008 Apr 14;168(7):728–734. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.7.728

Table 4.

Predictor of Obtaining Cancer Screening Test Among 1160 Women, San Francisco, California, 2003–2005^a

	Papanicolaou Test in Last 2 Years		Mammography in Last 2 Years		Colonoscopy in Last 10 Years

	Unadjusted Screened, %	Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)	Unadjusted Screened, %	Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)	Unadjusted Screened, %	Adjusted Odds Ratio (95% Confidence Interval)
Risk perception
No risk	58.5	1 [Reference]	82.2	1 [Reference]	18.7	1 [Reference]
Very low risk	74.5	1.5 (1.0–2.3)^b	87.9	0.9 (0.5–1.7)	43.7	1.4 (0.8–2.3)
Low risk	73.0	1.6 (1.0–2.4)^b	87.9	1.0 (0.5–1.9)	48.0	1.5 (0.9–2.4)
Moderate	74.6	1.8 (1.1–3.1)^b	90.8	1.2 (0.6–2.6)	57.1	2.1 (1.2–3.6)^c
High or very high risk	72.0	2.3 (1.1–5.0)^b	84.6	0.7 (0.3–1.5)	62.8	2.8 (1.4–5.4)^c
Ethnicity
White	74.2	1 [Reference]	89.3	1 [Reference]	54.5	1 [Reference]
African American	62.7	1.1 (0.7–1.9)	89.2	1.5 (0.7–3.0)	65.8	2.4 (1.5–3.9)^c
Latina	61.9	0.9 (0.5–1.5)	90.8	1.7 (0.8–3.5)	46.8	1.3 (0.8–2.2)
Asian	72.1	1.0 (0.6–1.6)	80.7	0.8 (0.4–1.6)	22.9	0.7 (0.5–1.1)

Other explanatory variables are not shown in the table; all of these multivariate logistic models were also adjusted for age, education, income, marital status, cancer history, hysterectomy, health status, insurance status, numeracy score, and employment status.

P < .05.

P < .01.