Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Surg. 2014 Apr;259(4):735–743. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a6909d

Table 3.

Uni- and multi-variate analyses for prognostic factors in CRC patients

Univariate Multivariate

Variables HR$ 95%CI p value HR$ 95%CI p value
Age (≥ 67 vs. <67) 0.76 0.42–1.35 0.35 - - -
Gender (Female vs. Male) 1.02 0.56–1.86 0.92 - - -
Pathological T stage (T3/4 vs.1/2) 8.97 2.19–36.7 0.0024 3.63 0.82–16.1 0.091
Pathology (poor vs. mod/well differentiated) 2.26 1.05–4.84 0.036 2.07 0.86–4.96 0.105
Lymph node metastasis (positive vs. negative) 17.1 6.18–47.8 < 0.0001 1.24 0.28–5.46 0.78
TNM stage (III/IV vs. I/II) 33.4 8.12–136.9 < 0.0001 10.2 1.27–81.7 0.03
CEA (≥ 5 vs. <5) 4.84 2.15–10.89 0.0001 1.46 0.57–3.74 0.43
miR-200c in serum (high vs. low) 2.43 1.26–4.68 0.006 2.67 1.28–5.67 0.01
miR-200c in primary tumor (high vs. low) 0.56 0.28–1.10 0.092 - - -

HR, Hazard ratio; CI, Confidence interval; CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen; mod, moderately; TNM, tumor-node-metastasis staging

$

HR, hazard ratio for survival outcome in CRC patients