Table 1.
Patient 1 |
42,XY,−3,hsr(11)(q23),−14,−16,−20[cp6]/43,idem,+mar[cp3]/46,XY[11].ish hsr(11)amp(MLL) |
Patient 2 |
44–45,XY,−5,hsr(11)(q23),−15,+mar1[cp3]/ |
48–50,sl,+6,+8,+20,+22[cp2]/ |
57−59,sdl1,+1,+del(1)(q12),+2,+7,+10,+hsr(11)(q23)a,+12,+13,+21 ,−mar1 ,+mar 2(cp3)/ |
59,sdl2,+X,−1,−del(1)(q12),+del(1)(q25),+5,+10,+11[cp6]/ |
73–77,sdl2,+Y,+del(1)(q12),+3,+4,+5,+6,+8,+9,+10,+11,−hsr(11),+12,+13, +14,+15,+16,+17,+17,+18,+18,+19,+22,−mar2,+mar3x2[cp7] .ish hsr(11)amp(MLL),hsr(11)aamp(MLL),mar3 amp(MLL) |
Different from hsr(11 q23) in the stem line, but a normal 11 is still present.