Table 3.
Overall appraisal of Thinking Healthy Program Module One
| Participants (n = 6) | Commune and Women’s Union representatives (n = 2) | |
|---|---|---|
| Value of activities done at home for putting into practice concepts covered in the session |
|
|
| Extremely useful |
5 |
2 |
| Useful |
1 |
- |
| A little useful |
- |
- |
| Not useful at all |
- |
- |
| The three step structure to thinking healthy made it easy to understand and practice healthy thinking and healthy actions |
|
|
| Strongly agree |
3 |
2 |
| Agree |
3 |
- |
| Neutral |
- |
- |
| Disagree |
- |
- |
| Strongly disagree |
- |
- |
| Comprehensibility of language used |
|
|
| All understandable |
6 |
2 |
| Somewhat understandable |
- |
- |
| Somewhat difficult to understand |
- |
- |
| Mostly difficult to understand |
- |
- |
| Comprehensibility of content |
|
|
| Easy to understand |
|
- |
| Understandable |
6 |
2 |
| Somewhat understandable |
- |
- |
| Difficult to understand |
- |
- |
| Utility of program to pregnant women in the community |
|
|
| Extremely useful |
5 |
2 |
| Useful |
1 |
- |
| A little useful |
- |
- |
| Not useful at all |
- |
- |
| Most suitable trainers for the program |
|
|
| Commune health station health worker |
5 |
2 |
| Village health worker |
- |
- |
| Commune women’s union member |
2 |
1 |
| Village women’s union member | - | - |