Skip to main content
. 2014 May 23;41(6):061714. doi: 10.1118/1.4875976

Table 3.

Mean, maximum, and standard deviations of SPR, mass density, and I-value differences to the reference values for SECT and DECT [71 Schneider et al. tissues (Ref. 2), Table 1]. DECT conversion comprehends two different ways of deriving the SPR: using the ϱe directly and elemental mass fractions only for the I-value (“DECT with ϱe”) or deriving mass density from ϱe and using elemental mass fractions for the I-value and mean Z/A to derive the ϱe for the SPR prediction 6.

(mean±sd), max differences      
to ground truth [%] CT modality Zeff < 8.2 Zeff ⩾ 8.2
SPR SECT (0.53 ± 0.58), max: 3.08 (0.27 ± 0.22), max: 0.77
  DECT (0.21 ± 0.13), max: 0.67 (0.06 ± 0.04), max: 0.14
 
DECT with ϱe
(0.06 ± 0.04), max: 0.18
(0.05 ± 0.03), max: 0.11
ϱ SECT (0.50 ± 0.57), max: 3.04 (0.30 ± 0.15), max: 0.66
 
DECT
(0.20 ± 0.17), max: 0.88
(0.05 ± 0.04), max: 0.14
I SECT (1.08 ± 1.42), max: 5.82 (1.26 ± 0.99), max: 3.90
  DECT (0.44 ± 0.29), max: 1.34 (0.33 ± 0.23), max: 0.96