Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;37(6):315–318. doi: 10.1007/s00238-014-0936-6

Table 1.

Patient data and outcome

Number Age Indication Location Type Rot/deg. Compl. Rev. FU (month)
1 81 BCC UL J P 120 N N 63
2 74 LM C Z P 90 N N 60
3 60 BCC Ns NL P 150 Ya N 59
4 73 BCC Ns NL P 150 N N 58
5 DS Ns NL VY N N 58
6 86 MB Ns ST P 180 Yb N 57
7 80 BCC UL NL/J VY N N 56
8 71 BCC AN NL P 180 N N 52
9 83 BCC UL NL/J VY N N 40
10 79 BCC Ns NL P 180 N Mi 37
11 38 BCC AN/UL NL P 180 N Mi 24
12 BCC UL+ NL VY N N 24
13 74 AK Ns ST P 180 N N 15
14 78 BCC AN NL P 180 N Mi 15
15 68 BCC FH ST P 150 N Mi 14
16 70 BCC Ns NL P 180 N N 13
17 83 SCC C NL/C VY N N 8
18 59 BCC AN NL P 180 N N 6
19 73 BCC Ns NL P 180 N N 4
20 54 MM UL J P 135 N N 3
21 79 BCC Mc OO P 150 N N 1

Compl. complications, Rev. revision, FU follow-up, Rot/deg degree of rotation, BCC basal cell carcinoma, AN ala nasi, NL nasolabial, P propella, Mi minor revision/contouring, UL upper lip, VY VY advancement flap, J jowel, UL + upper lip and adjacent aesthetical unit, MC medial canthus, DS donor site, Ns nose, MB Morbus Bowen, FH forehead, ST supratrochlear, LM lentigo maligna, Z zygomatic, AK actinic keratosis, C cheek, OO orbicularis oculi, SCC squamous cell carcinoma, MM malignant melanoma, N noY yes

aPartial flap loss

bVenous congestion