Skip to main content
. 2014 Jul 6;11(96):20140287. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0287

Table 1.

Effective values of the spacing ratio (Inline graphic) measured on wing feathers from this work are compared against values obtained from microscopy (Inline graphic) of barbs and barbules from the literature for wing feathers and breast feathers. In the last column, an estimate of the half-spacing of defect sites (ℓdefect) deduced from contact angle measurements is also reported, and its significance is detailed in §3.5 in the main text.

bird species Inline graphic wing feathers Inline graphic wing feathers
Inline graphic breast feathers
defect (µm)
barbs barbules barbs barbules
African darter 1.28 ± 0.10 1.7a 1.6a 4.5b, 9.9a 7.6a 220 ± 50
reed cormorant 1.24 ± 0.14 4.2a 2.4a 4.3b, 8.5a 2.9a 190 ± 70
great cormorant 1.57 ± 0.15 4.8b 290 ± 30
mallard 1.84 ± 0.13 5.7a 1.9a 5.9b, 10.6a 2.9a 250 ± 30
European shag 1.91 ± 0.16 350 ± 30
common shelduck 1.89 ± 0.12 6.7a 2.1a 11.1a 3.5a 280 ± 30

a[17].

b[12].