Skip to main content
. 2014 May 9;11:61. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-11-61

Table 2.

Descriptive characteristics of the total sample and independent bivariate analysis with active school travel per week

 
 
Bivariate associations with active school travel per week*
  Mean ± SD Estimate t value p
Distance (% within 1 mile)
62.76 ± 20.33
0.0276
13.62
<0.0001
Socio-demographic factors (% of students)
 
 
 
 
    White
56.31 ± 25.97
0.0011
0.70
0.4856
    African American
12.64 ± 15.74
−0.0099
−3.83
0.0002
    Hispanic
19.28 ± 24.33
0.0075
4.80
<0.0001
    Free or reduced lunch
45.03 ± 27.74
−0.0021
−1.36
0.1748
Physical factors
 
 
 
 
    Temperature (°F)
50.50 ± 15.43
0.0047
1.74
0.0851
    Walk/bikeability (% good or very good)
48.92 ± 26.68
0.0034
2.22
0.0283
Parents’ perceived barriers (% of barriers endorsed by parents)
 
 
 
 
    Safety and weather
34.38 ± 8.33
−0.0272
−6.03
<0.0001
    Suitability of the route to school
19.73 ± 7.14
−0.0175
−3.03
0.0030
    Time issue
15.85 ± 4.90
−0.0009
−0.11
0.9148
    No walking companion
18.84 ± 5.94
−0.0308
−4.75
<0.0001
    Children’s resistance
7.67 ± 4.38
−0.0627
−7.94
<0.0001
Parents’ perceived active school travel norms (% perceiving others walking/biking to school with children every day and a few times a week)
53.61 ± 15.04
0.0166
4.09
<0.0001
Children’s perceived barriers (% of barriers endorsed by children)
35.67 ± 4.72
−0.0431
−5.81
<0.0001
Children’s perceived active school travel norms (% perceiving other kids walking/biking to school) 56.32 ± 12.81 0.0158 3.85 0.0002

* Bivariate associations were adjusted for distance and clustering (school*time). Distance adjusted for clustering only.