Table 1.
Overview of clinical studies evaluating NIR spectroscopy employment for medical applications.
First author, year | Study design | Subject age | Number of study patients | Procedure | Procedure performed by | Procedure setting | Device used | Benefit to technology |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hess [70] (2010) | Historical control | 3 days–17 years | 91 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Nurses | Hospital | VeinViewer | Benefit |
| ||||||||
Strehle [1] (2010) | Nonrandomized prospective | 0–16 years | 50 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion or blood draw | Consultants, registrars, senior house officers, and nurses | Outpatient | VeinViewer | N/A |
| ||||||||
Cuper et al. [71] (2011) | Historical control | 0–6 years | 125 | Blood draw | Phlebotomists | Phlebotomy station | VascuLuminator | Benefit |
| ||||||||
Chapman et al. [72] (2011) | Prospective randomized controlled | 0–17 years | 323 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Pediatric ER nurses | Pediatric ER, elective IVs | VeinViewer | Benefit |
| ||||||||
Perry et al. [73] (2011) | Prospective randomized controlled | 0–20 years | 123 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Pediatric ER nurses | Pediatric ER, elective IVs | VeinViewer | No benefit |
| ||||||||
Cuper et al. [74] (2012) | Nonrandomized prospective | <3 years | 77 | Arterial line insertion | Experienced pediatric anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists | Operating room, before cardiothoracic surgery | VascuLuminator | No benefit |
| ||||||||
Kaddoum et al. [68] (2012) | Prospective randomized controlled | 0.18–17.1 years | 146 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Experienced pediatric anesthesiologists | Operating room, elective procedures | AccuVein AV 300 | No benefit |
| ||||||||
Kim et al. [75] (2012) | Prospective randomized controlled | 1 month–16 years | 111 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Nurses | Hospital | VeinViewer | Benefit |
| ||||||||
Peterson et al. [76] (2012) | Nonrandomized prospective | 0–19 years | 155 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Nurses | Hospital | VeinViewer | No benefit |
| ||||||||
Phipps et al. [66] (2012) | Prospective randomized controlled | Preterm and term neonates (23–40 weeks) | 115 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Expert level neonatal nurse practitioners and registered nurse peripheral IV catheter team | Hospital | VeinViewer | Benefit |
| ||||||||
Cuper et al. [77] (2013) | Cluster randomized | 0–18 years | 494 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Experienced pediatric anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, and trainees | Operating room, elective procedures | VascuLuminator | No benefit |
| ||||||||
de Graaff et al. [3] (2013) | Cluster randomized | 0–18 years | 1383 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Experienced pediatric anesthesiologists, nurse anesthetists, and trainees | Operating room, elective procedures | VeinViewer, AccuVein AV 300, VascuLuminator | No benefit |
| ||||||||
Sun et al. [78] (2013) | Prospective randomized controlled | 3 months–17 years | 60 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Nurses | Pediatric ICU | VeinViewer | Benefit |
| ||||||||
van der Woude et al. [79] (2013) | Cluster randomized | 0–15 years | 88 | Peripheral IV catheter insertion | Anesthesiologists | Operating room, elective procedures | VascuLuminator | No benefit |
Hess [70] (2010) evaluated patients for 6 months using standard techniques and compared the results to patients treated subsequently with the VeinViewer. Cuper et al. [71] (2011) evaluated patients for 10 weeks using standard techniques and compared the results to patients treated subsequently with the VascuLuminator. Benefits to technology were any considered benefits measured in the study populations (described in more detail in Table 2). N/A signifies no analysis performed (feasibility or less rigorous study demonstrating the general usability of the device).