Skip to main content
. 2014 May 16;5:443. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00443

Table 1.

Univariate descriptives for the raw and composite scores.

Type of measure Tasks N Mean SD Median Min Max Skew Kurt.
TIME 1
Age (in months) 68 56.00 10.54 56.0 38.00 80.00 0.12 −0.90
Nonvb. intelligence Raven 68 16.00 4.05 15.50 8.00 27.00 0.59 0.09
Trait anxiety Spence 68 28.50 14.36 25.0 6.00 68.00 0.55 −0.42
Verbal STM Word span 66 3.60 0.74 3.70 2.00 5.30 0.02 −0.17
Digit span 66 4.00 0.84 4.00 2.00 6.30 0.31 0.53
Visuospatial STM Corsi blocks 68 2.80 0.66 2.70 1.66 5.00 0.81 0.92
TIME 2
Verbal STM Word span 68 4.00 0.63 4.00 2.33 5.30 −0.21 −0.28
Digit span 68 4.20 0.83 4.00 2.33 6.30 0.35 −0.32
Visuospatial STM Corsi blocks 68 2.90 0.70 2.70 1.33 5.00 0.47 0.17
Verbal WM Counting span 63 1.62 0.58 1.50 1.00 3.00 0.54 −0.75
Backward span 63 1.11 0.59 1.00 0.17 2.70 0.19 −0.25
Listening span 61 1.23 0.67 1.33 0.33 2.30 −0.44 −1.44
Visuospatial WM Mr. X 63 0.84 0.53 0.84 0.17 1.70 0.27 −1.32
Odd-one-out 63 1.61 0.51 1.50 0.67 2.70 0.15 −0.77
Response suppression Statue 68 25.65 4.80 27.00 10.00 30.00 −1.77 2.58
Response conflict Stroop matrix accuracy 68 13.94 2.97 15.00 2.00 16.00 −1.86 3.77
Stroop matrix IE 66 1.61 0.77 1.40 0.69 4.20 1.44 2.01
Knock and Tap 67 27.21 2.78 28.00 18.00 30.00 −1.31 1.46
Shifting Post-switch DCCS 67 4.24 1.94 6 1 6 −0.33 −1.70
Composite measures Vb. WM 61 1.32 0.52 1.39 0.50 2.28 0.08 −1.02
Vs. WM 63 1.23 0.46 1.17 0.42 2.17 0.30 −0.88

Inverse efficiency (IE) was calculated as response time divided by accuracy. Kurt., Kurtosis.