Skip to main content
. 2014 May 26;8:87. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00087

Table 7.

Results of multiple linear regression analyses for all subjects (n = 49).

Outcome Unstandardized coefficient Standard error t-value p-value
LANGUAGE COMPOSITE SCORE
Intercept −3.79 46.14 −0.08 0.94
MD left Putamen 133.0 61.05 2.18 0.035
Age 1.65 0.84 1.96 0.056
UHL −15.70 4.40 −3.57 0.001
Intercept 61.23 18.81 3.26 0.002
FA right inferior longitudinal fasciculus 55.75 26.24 2.13 0.039
Age 1.12 0.81 1.38 0.175
UHL −11.66 4.27 −2.73 0.009
FULL IQ
Intercept 43.56 32.39 1.35 0.188
FA right middle cerebellar peduncle 80.44 35.26 2.28 0.029
Age 0.76 1.33 0.57 0.57
UHL −7.59 7.01 −1.08 0.286
PERFORMANCE IQ
Intercept 184.2 22.87 8.05 <0.001
FA left uncinate fasciculus −129.0 46.54 −2.77 0.008
Age −1.30 0.89 −1.45 0.153
UHL −13.20 4.76 −2.77 0.008
VERBAL IQ
Intercept 44.47 24.20 1.84 0.073
FA splenium of the corpus callosum 62.67 24.03 2.61 0.012
Age 1.14 0.82 1.40 0.168
UHL −7.90 4.12 −1.92 0.061
Intercept 140.5 21.10 6.66 <0.001
MD right middle cerebellar peduncle −78.73 30.13 −2.61 0.013
Age 1.16 0.87 1.34 0.189
UHL −10.24 4.60 −2.23 0.033
Intercept 50.93 20.67 2.47 0.019
FA left middle cerebellar peduncle 61.70 24.21 2.55 0.016
Age 1.43 0.88 1.64 0.112
UHL −9.31 4.65 −2.00 0.054

Standardized scores for educational outcomes were the dependent variables, and the DTI parameters (FA, Fractional Anisotropy; MD, Mean Diffusivity) for the stated regions of interest, age and hearing status (i.e., unilateral hearing loss, UHL) were entered in the models as predictors. FA, Fractional Anisotropy; MD, Mean Diffusivity.