Abstract
New nucleos(t)ide analogues (NAs) with high genetic barrier to hepatitis B virus (HBV) resistance (such as entecavir, tenofovir) have improved the prognosis of patients with HBV decompensated cirrhosis and have prevented HBV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT). NAs are considered the most proper approach for HBV infection in patients under renal replacement therapy but their doses should be adjusted according to the patient’s creatinine clearance. In addition, physicians should be aware of the potential nephrotoxicity. However, patients with chronic hepatitis C and decompensated cirrhosis can receive only one therapeutic option before LT, as well as for Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after LT, which is the combination of subcutaneous Peg-IFN and ribavirin. Generally, therapy for HCV after renal transplantation should be avoided. Although the optimal antiviral therapy for HCV infection has not been established, attention has turned to a new, oral direct acting antiviral treatment which marks a promising strategy in prognosis and in amelioration of these diseases.
Keywords: Liver transplantation, Kidney transplantation, Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, Recurrence
Core tip: While nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) offer a benign course in patients with hepatitis B virus before and after liver and renal transplantation, there is still scope for improvement. The administration of high genetic barrier NAs such as entecavir or tenofovir pre-transplant and the careful patient selection for hepatitis virus immunoglobulin-free regimens post-transplant contribute to improved medical care and facilitate its provision from a practical standpoint. Concordantly, attention has turned to new treatment strategies regarding hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver and renal transplantation. The addition of oral direct acting antivirals to the existing treatment marks a promising strategy for prognosis amelioration of these patients.
INTRODUCTION
The major breakthrough in the field of transplantation for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) is the application of nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) and direct acting antivirals (DAAs). NAs form the mainstay in the treatment of patients with HBV in the non-transplant setting as well as before and after liver and kidney transplantation. The preliminary data regarding the DAAs application favored its use in treatment of HCV recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) and in HCV renal transplant candidates.
In general, the induction of immunosuppressive therapy carries the risk of HBV reactivation, leading to liver graft loss and fatal complications[1,2]. NAs have dramatically improved the clinical course of patients with HBV decompensated cirrhosis, reducing the need for LT, and have further improved the prognosis of HBV transplant patients[3,4]. At present, due to high rates of resistance[3,4], lamivudine is preferable only when short term immunosuppression is scheduled. Entecavir and tenofovir are the first choice NAs because they have very high efficacy and low resistant rates[5,6]. NAs administration implies detailed renal function monitoring. Telbivudine may improve renal function but it has an unfavorable resistance profile[7].
In regards to transplantation in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC), improvements in the understanding of the viral cycle have led to development of the first generation DAAs (telaprevir and boceprevir) which belong to HCV NS3/4 protease inhibitors[8,9]. Their addition to the standard of treatment [pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV)] has improved the response rates in a small number of liver transplant recipients and in a few cases of renal transplant candidates. When DAAs are used, calcineurin inhibitors doses should be adjusted[10] and the hemoglobin levels should be regularly monitored. The present review focuses on the current treatment of patients with HBV and HCV before and after liver and kidney transplantation.
MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS B AND C BEFORE AND AFTER LT
The management of patients with hepatitis B and C listed for LT contains a three step approach. Targeted therapy should start before transplantation and continue after transplantation, becoming more intensive immediately post-transplant when the immunosuppression is higher. Therapy escalation in an early post-transplant stage is imperative mainly for avoidance of HBV recurrence, while routine prophylactic therapy for HCV recurrence is not recommended[11,12] (Table 1).
Table 1.
Chronic hepatitis B | Chronic hepatitis C | |||
Liver transplantation | Kidney transplantation | Liver transplantation | Kidney transplantation | |
Pre transplant | NAs1 | Peg IFN ± RBV ± DAAs3 (depending on genotype and type of DAA) | PegIFN plus very low dose RBV (plus DAAs)4 | |
Post transplant | Prophylaxis and treatment | No prophylaxis2 | ||
Short term HBIG plus NA | NAs1 | Peg IFN ± RBV ± DAAs3 (depending on genotype and type of DAA) | Peg IFN plus very low dose RBV |
Entecavir or tenofovir are the advisable NAs in adjusted doses regarding creatinine clearance;
Therapy is indicated in fulminant cholestatic hepatitis and de novo glomerulonephritis;
Records for boceprevir, telaprevir and sofosbuvir. Τriple combination is preferable in cases of cirrhosis (METAVIR fibrosis stages 3 and 4), cholestatic hepatitis, previous virological failure and in the presence of predictors of poor response;
There are only cases for the use of DAAs in renal transplant candidates. HBV: Hepatitis B virus; HCV: Hepatitis C virus; NA: Nucleos(t)ide analog; HBIG: Hepatitis virus immunoglobulin; DAAs: Direct oral acting antivirals; Peg IFN: Peg interferon; RBV: Ribavirin.
HBV positive and HCV positive liver transplant candidates
Before transplantation, treatment aims to eliminate viral load, to keep it undetectable at the time of transplantation in order to lower the risk of HBV recurrence and improve the outcome[13,14]. HBV DNA clearance pre-transplant has reduced the rate of HBV recurrence in patients with HBV infection[15]. Similarly, HCV RNA eradication pre-transplant resulted in amelioration of fibrosis and long term survival in patients with HCV infection[13,15-18]. The suppression of HCV viremia in LT candidates and the undetectable HBV DNA at the time of LT are the most important goals for each particular infection.
The current management of patients with cirrhosis and CHB before LT is based on NAs[3,15] and modification of lifestyle, comorbidities and drug interactions[19]. Generally, the institution of NAs has ameliorated the transplant prognostic scores to such a high level that many LT candidates with CHB have delisted[20-22], presenting with great clinical improvement and better survival[23-25]. NA administration as monotherapy or in combination are the current guidelines for LT candidates with HBV decompensated cirrhosis[26-28]. The high genetic barrier antivirals entecavir and tenofovir are recommended as monotherapy. Entecavir has reduced the HBV DNA in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, has improved their underlying liver function up to 70% and has presented with very low resistant rates[22,29-31]. Tenofovir has also been an effective initiation therapy, accounting for high fibrosis resolution over five years administration[32-34] with almost negligible resistance. When administered in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, it led to virological, biochemical and clinical improvement with very good tolerance[35].
Nevertheless, entecavir should not be applied in patients with proven lamivudine-resistance because there are high chances of resistance and treatment failure[30], while tenofovir should be used with caution because of potential tubular injury and osteomalacia[34]. However, recent trials have doubted tenofovir nephrotoxicity after ten years of therapy in large groups of HIV infected patients[36,37] or even the nucleotide nephrotoxicity in LT recipients[38].
Furthermore, it has been hypothesized that an antiviral combination might achieve higher virological response rates and lower resistance rates compared to monotherapy. However, emtricitabine plus tenofovir (200 mg and 300 mg daily respectively) have not been found to have superior antiviral potency compared to entecavir and tenofovir monotherapy[35]. In addition, the higher cost of antiviral combination compared to monotherapies limits its use in clinical practice. In conclusion, all patients on NA therapy should be monitored every three months for virological response and possible virological breakthrough with serum HBV-DNA testing[39,40].
Contrary to LT candidates with CHB, patients with CHC and decompensated cirrhosis have only one therapeutic option before LT. This is the combination of subcutaneous Peg-IFN and RBV, leading to reduced cirrhosis-related complications and improving histological changes[41], but in an unsatisfactory percentage of patients (5%-33% in genotype 1 and 14%-100% in genotypes 2/3)[12,42-45]. IFN-based regimens have also been related to poor tolerability and many side effects[42,44], such as anemia, infections and neuropsychiatric disorders[46], which require either erythropoietin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factors or antibiotics to sustain drug regimen optimal doses[47]. The aim is undetectable HCV RNA or SVR at LT to reduce the frequency of HCV recurrence[13].
HBV positive and HCV positive liver transplant recipients
The primary goal in this step is the prevention of HBsAg appearance in a patient with erased HBV infection (HBV recurrence) and a new HBV DNA finding in a patient with negative HBsAg (virological breakthrough)[48]. The combination of HBV immunoglobulin (HBIG) with high genetic barrier NA (entecavir or tenofovir) for the long term is the most effective prophylactic approach for HBV recurrence prevention[49,50]. However, the high cost of HBIG and the fact that the majority of patients receive a transplant with undetectable or minimal HBV DNA since they have been on NAs before LT led to the use of short term HBIG or HBIG-free regimens in the post-transplant period. In the first case, LT recipients take a combination of HBIG and NA for a short period post-transplant, continuing with NA monotherapy long term[49]. In a group of LT recipients with low risk for HBV recurrence (only 4.5% had detectable HBV DNA at the time of LT), entecavir or tenofovir monoprophylaxis after HBIG discontinuation was similarly effective, with no difference in renal adverse events[38,49].
Regarding the HBIG-free prophylactic regimens, dual NAs such as tenofovir and emtricitabine or tenofovir plus entecavir[51-54] accounted for undetectable HBV DNA after 26 mo treatment post LT, but they did not eliminate cases of recurrence[49,52]. Entecavir and tenofovir should be the first-line options for HBIG-free prophylaxis. It is advisable that entecavir not be used in patients with previous lamivudine resistance who should be preferably treated with tenofovir. Until the optimal HBIG-free prophylactic regimen is determined, the combination of HBIG (at least for a short period) and one high genetic barrier NA appears to be the most reasonable post-transplant approach[49,55].
Physicians should individualize the therapeutic regimen according to the pre-transplant type of liver disease, the patient’s viremic status and the risk of reactivation[56,57]. HBV DNA clearance and HBeAg negativity at the time of LT, fulminant HBV and hepatitis D virus coinfection may allow HBIG reduction or withdrawal strategies[48]. At present, more and more patients maintain HBV DNA undetectable peritransplant so their prognosis has improved[3]. In our clinical setting, we use maintenance therapy with entecavir or tenofovir monoprophylaxis after a short course with low dose HBIG plus entecavir or tenofovir as antiviral prophylaxis against HBV recurrence after LT. Striking techniques such as covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) could detect occult HBV (HBV infection with negative HBsAg test) in hepatic and extrahepatic sites early. Nevertheless, Lenci et al[58] showed that many patients had a recurrence after cessation of any anti-viral prophylaxis despite negative cccDNA.
Regarding HCV positive liver transplant recipients, recurrence of HCV infection occurs in virtually all patients transplanted for HCV-related liver disease after LT. Additionally, three years post-transplant, decompensation developed in 70% of recipients compared with other immunocompetent groups in which the same proportion was less than 10%[59]. Post-transplant prophylaxis (preemptive) against HCV recurrence is not recommended because randomized trials have not confirmed its superiority regarding treatment when there was recurrence and it was associated with high cost and poor tolerability[11,12,60]. Interferon (ΙFN) use on the basis of high immunosuppression has not been effective and has been related to sepsis and rejection episodes[13,61]. Indications for antiviral therapy are fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and significant fibrosis[61] [METAVIR score > F1[62], hepatic venous gradient > 6[63] and liver stiffness > 8.7 kPa[64]], but not fibrosis level > 3 because those patients cannot tolerate therapy[18]. Emphasis should be given to prompt diagnosis of histological evidence of HCV recurrence. Patients with female gender, steatosis of the graft, older donor age[65-67], cytomegalovirus and human herpes virus 6 infection[68] require sustained attention with protocol graft biopsies, regardless of normal liver function tests and good clinical condition. Non-invasive diagnostic methods such as elastography, serum and molecular fibrosis markers should also be used simultaneously[47].
The combination of Peg-IFN with RBV is again the standard of care for HCV recurrence after LT. Likewise, the regimen’s efficacy is frustrating because after 72 wk of administration, SVR stabilization was achieved in only 30% of recipients[69-71]. The currently used DAAs, boceprevir and telaprevir, on the top of the old regimen have shown very promising results for the treatment of HCV reinfection in LT recipients with CHC[61]. Five studies[72-76] have demonstrated that the institution of the triple regimen obtained SVR in 50%-89% of LT recipients with CHC, mostly with genotype 1, when administered for 12 to 66 wk (Table 2). Serious side effects, fatal events, were recorded in two studies[73]. Although the place of DAAs in the management of LT recipients has not been totally clarified, two reported algorithms[19,61] may guide therapy. According to them, the triple regimen should be applied in cases of cirrhosis (METAVIR fibrosis stages 3 and 4), cholestatic hepatitis, previous virological failure and in the presence of predictors of poor response. Interestingly, sofosbuvir (NS5B inhibitor) combined only with RBV with or without PEG IFN demonstrated strong antiviral potency and disease improvement of CHC recurrence in LT recipients[77]. These are all very promising data but need to be tested in large multicenter prospective trials to become the standard of care.
Table 2.
Boceprevir (n) | Telaprevir (n) | Complete virological response | Side effects | |
Coilly et al[72] | 18 | 19 | 58% TVR | Anemia 92% |
89% BOC | Infections 27% | |||
Fatal events 8% | ||||
Pungpapong et al[73] | 31 | 35 | 86% TVR | Anemia 95% |
48%BOC | Infections 10% | |||
Renal dysfunction 76% | ||||
Fatal events 3% | ||||
Werner et al[74] | - | 9 | 88.80% | Anemia 75% |
Rash 33% | ||||
Renal dysfunction 33% | ||||
Stravitz et al[75] | 50 | 62% | Anemia 82% | |
Renal failure | ||||
Fatal events 7% | ||||
Ann Brown et al[76] | - | 46 | 60% | Anemia 48% |
Rash 35% | ||||
Pruritus 22% | ||||
Renal failure 22% | ||||
Infections 22% | ||||
Anorectal symptoms 41% | ||||
Forns et al[77] | Sofosbuvir 115 | 78% | Fatal events 16% |
BOC: Boceprevir; TVR: Telaprevir.
In line with reducing severity of HCV recurrence after LT, immunosuppression is one of the major factors that accounts for accelerated HCV recurrence. For example, both steroid boluses as well as their very rapid tapering have been associated with aggressive HCV recurrence and graft loss. Interestingly, the long term maintenance immunosuppression with azathioprine, tacrolimus and prednisolone delayed the appearance of histologically proven severe fibrosis, while the sirolimus therapy led to HCV RNA elimination without antiviral treatment[78,79].
MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH HEPATITIS B AND C BEFORE AND AFTER KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION
HBV positive and HCV positive renal transplant candidates
Antiviral therapy advances for HBV and HCV infection on renal transplantation (RT) have indicated great benefits in pre-transplantation and post-transplantation management and results[80-83]. However, antiviral therapy for HCV is hardly tolerated by RT candidates, especially if they have comorbidities and dialysis-related complications. It may not be wise for HCV positive patients with congestive heart failure, uncontrolled diabetes and with short life expectancy to receive antiviral therapy[84,85].
HBV and HCV positive candidates for RT should preferably undergo liver biopsy. The transjugular route is preferable since coagulation abnormalities are very common[86]. Fibroscan and other noninvasive techniques are supplementary. The presence of cirrhosis precludes patients from sole RT, while in patients with decompensated cirrhosis combined liver and kidney transplantation is the recommended option[87-90].
HBV positive RT candidates should initiate antiviral therapy when HBV DNA > 2000 IU/mL or HBV DNA ≤ 2000 IU/mL two weeks before RT[39,91,92]. Therapy should be instituted as long as immunosuppressive therapy lasts whatever the HBV DNA level is[2] or for at least the first 2 years when immunosuppressive therapy is most intense[91]. HCV positive RT candidates should receive therapy when there is active viral replication (HCV RNA positive) and a biopsy proven chronic hepatitis[93]. Before transplantation, the goal is the accomplishment of HBV DNA clearance to prevent post-transplant virological relapse and liver-related complications[26,80,94]. The disappearance of viral load is a prerequisite for a HBV or HCV positive patient on hemodialysis to be enrolled in the RT list. Therapy with entecavir, tenofovir or lamivudine on adjusted doses for renal function is included in the current guidelines for prophylaxis of HBV positive RT candidates[26,80,91,94]. The NA optimal regimen has not been proposed yet, so prophylaxis may start before or at the time of RT and continue thereafter[91,92]. Entecavir should be the first line option for avoidance of short term resistance and adefovir nephrotoxicity[91], while tenofovir had better be applied in case of lamivudine resistance.
Guidelines for HCV positive RT candidates recommend treatment with interferon α (α-IFN) in adjusted doses for renal function[93,95], although studies in this population[96,97] have shown the advantage of IFN and RBV to provide persistent SVR. The very severe anemia and heart failure caused by the combinative regimen avert clinicians from using it in clinical practice[97]. However, the addition of very low doses RBV (200-400 mg three times weekly) under thorough monitoring (weekly measure of hemoglobin, application of high erythropoietin doses and iron supplementation) could result in HCV RNA clearance and allow more patients to get on to the list[93]. The preliminary results for five RT candidates with CHC treated with the triple regimen of IFN, RBV and DAAs (four received telaprevir and one boceprevir)[98,99] are very promising. Telaprevir and boceprevir has not required dose adjustment to renal function so far. After 12 to 48 wk of triple therapy, viral load disappeared in 4/5 of patients, while moderate, almost expected side-effects were noted. These were dysgeusia, diarrhea and anemia, leading to the increase of the doses of erythropoietin and the modification of RBV doses.
HBV positive and HCV positive renal transplant recipients
The high doses of immunosuppressants (steroids and anti-CD3 antibody) required to avoid graft rejection post-transplant may be responsible for rapidly progressive liver disease and fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis[100,101]. Initially, HBV positive RT recipients should be under close surveillance and continue the same treatment started before RT. Entecavir is again the therapy of choice. It has been tried in naïve, lamivudine or adefovir resistant RT recipients for 33 mo[102-106], providing excellent results regarding HBV DNA reduction, without aggravation of creatinine clearance, microalbuminuria or allograft rejection. Discontinuation of applied NA is desirable in cases of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis and resistance, which may occur as hepatic flare and rarely as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and fatal liver decompensation[105,107]. Tenofovir (245 mg daily) adapted to creatinine clearance could be a safe alternative subsequent to resistance[108] on the condition that tubular injury is of great concern. If renal allograft dysfunction is in progress and the HBV positive RT recipient presents with a low viral load, the inception of telbivudine could potentially lead to renal function recovery[20,109-111].
Therapy of HCV after RT should only be considered in RT recipients with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis or de novo glomerulonephritis[93,112]. α-IFN alone or α-IFN plus RBV post-transplantation are contraindicated because a high percent of irreversible and steroid resistant acute allograft rejection and low efficacy levels have been recorded[113,114]. In our clinical setting, HBV positive and HCV positive RT recipients are screened for liver enzymes, bilirubin and prothrombin time at each visit. Ultrasonography with triplex of splenoportal axis and/or transient elastography is monitored annually. HBV DNA and HCV RNA as well as a-fetoprotein are tested every year. In patients with cirrhosis, endoscopy for detection or monitoring of varices is performed every 1-2 years. All HBV positive and HCV positive RT recipients should avoid alcohol and hepatotoxic drugs. In the case of fever, effective antibiotics are started immediately. Liver biopsy and modulation of antivirals is considered in patients with abnormal liver function and/or increased viral load.
SELECTION OF PATIENTS WHO NEED CLOSE MONITORING
High HBV viral load pre and peritransplant predispose to closer patient surveillance and stronger prophylactic antiviral regimens. This group of patients is more likely to progress to decompensation and to HCC[115]. It is preferable that they be treated with entecavir or tenofovir and often be monitored for signs of decompensation. In a case of severe decompensation, patients receiving antivirals are at higher risk of lactic acidosis so physicians should be vigilant. LT candidates with HCV compensated cirrhosis are more vulnerable to IFN-related hematological toxicities since the splenomegaly caused by portal hypertension magnifies the risk for cytopenias[116]. Therefore, IFN dose modification and close regular monitoring is recommended. Furthermore, therapy in patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score C (or MELD score > 18) is challenging and should be carried out in dedicated and experienced centers because IFN may cause sepsis and is associated with a low sustained virological response (SVR) rate[61]. Careful monitoring should also be applied to patients with CTP score B. They need individualization of treatment decisions regarding non-genotype 1, high viral load, treatment naïve or relapse from previous antiviral therapies[13].
RT recipients with severe liver disease should receive non aggressive immunosuppressive protocols (cannot always be applied in immunologically high risk patients) and a selected immunosuppressive regimen with minimal or preferably no steroid use. All antivirals should be modified continuously regarding current renal function. Additionally, HBsAg-positive RT recipients with cirrhosis are at risk for hepatic decompensation after isolated RT and therefore they require simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation[86]. In conclusion, we should be on the alert for all HCV positive RT recipients which means screening them regularly for HCC[117], emergence of diabetes, renal thrombotic microangiopathy[118], glomerulonephritis[119,120], renal graft nephropathy[118] and sepsis[121].
SPECIAL TREATMENT CONSIDERATIONS
Generally, entecavir and tenofovir are the preferable antiviral treatment for post LT or RT recipients due to its high resistance barrier, the favorable safety profile and the regression of fibrosis with long term application[34,122]. However, entecavir is not advisable for patients with lamivudine resistance and it should be applied carefully in patients with decompensated cirrhosis with MELD score ≥ 22 because cases of lactic acidosis have been recorded with its administration[115]. Tenofovir is the only effective choice practically for patients with resistance to lamivudine or any nucleoside analogue[39] but there are concerns about creatinine clearance decline and acute tubular nephropathy during long term therapy, especially in group of patients with high risk for renal dysfunction over time such as RT and LT recipients[122]. Telbivudine is the only NA with a renal protective effect but its use in the RT and LT setting has still not been tested. Other NA limitations are the indefinite course and the relatively high cost of therapy which complicate patient compliance. Similar concerns exist about the cost and efficacy of HBIG continuation in HBV positive LT recipients. The duration of HBIG prophylaxis in HBV positive LT recipients is controversial and challenging and should be discussed on a case-by-case basis. The access to optimal therapy for HCV positive RT and LT recipients is limited by the low tolerance or contraindication of IFN-based regimens and the lack of experience of the efficacy and safety of first generation DAAs. Newer DAAs (such as sofosbuvir) need further evaluation in this setting.
HBV AND HCV POSITIVE DONORS
Many studies have shown that liver grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be used safely in: (1) HBsAg negative but anti-HBc/antiHBs positive recipients without antiviral prophylaxis[123]; (2) in HBsAg positive recipients on the condition that dual therapy HBIG and NAs is applied[123]; and (3) anti-HBc and/or antiHBs negative recipients when receiving long term prophylaxis with lamivudine, dual therapy or no prophylaxis[123,124]. Heterogeneity of data exists regarding the use of liver grafts from HBsAg positive donors[125-128].
Similarly, renal grafts from anti-HBc positive donors can be used in HBsAg negative recipients without prophylaxis[129]. It is acceptable practice for renal grafts from HBsAg positive donors to be used in HBsAg positive or HBsAg negative recipients with subsequent long term NA administration with or without ΗΒIG[130,131]. In all cases, serial HBV DNA measurements regardless of normal liver biochemistry are required. In particular, in LT or RT recipients who are not on any antiviral prophylaxis, an increase in viral load indicates NA initiation. On the other hand, when immunosuppression is reduced and complete viral clearance has been achieved, NA interruption could be considered[103] (Table 3).
Table 3.
Donor | Recipient | Prophylaxis | |
Liver transplantation | Anti-HBc positive | HBsAg positive | HBIG plus NA |
HBsAg negative | No prophylaxis | ||
Anti-HBc positive | |||
Anti-HBs positive | |||
Anti-HBc negative | Long term lamivudine | ||
Anti-HBs negative | |||
HBsAg positive | Anti-HBc positive | HBIG plus NA | |
Kidney transplantation | Anti-HBc positive | HBsAg negative | No prophylaxis |
Treatment when HBV DNA increases | |||
HBsAg positive | HBsAg positive | HBIG plus lamivudine | |
(HBV DNA negative) | HBsAg negative | Long term lamivudine | |
(HBV DNA) negative |
HBV: Hepatitis B virus; NA: Nucleos(t)ide analog; HBIG: Hepatitis virus immunoglobulin.
LT candidates with HCV-related cirrhosis can undergo LT from HCV positive donors if they are not HCV RNA positive because early hepatitis C recurrence may occur[132,133]. Renal grafts from HCV positive donors are acceptable only for HCV positive RT candidates[93]. In this setting, the survival of HCV positive RT recipients increases compared to their survival rates if they remain on hemodialysis[134,135]. Renal grafts from HCV positive donors should not be distributed to HCV negative recipients because many fatal liver complications have been recorded[136,137].
CONCLUSION
Current knowledge on the management of patients with HBV offers effective and safe options for liver or renal transplantation. Individualization and determination of less nephrotoxic and finite duration antiviral treatment will enhance the quality of their treatment and prognosis. Various types of vaccinations (S and pre-S antigen vaccines, DNA vaccination, T cell vaccines) and some monoclonal antibodies (exbivirumab and libivirumab) are promising for preventing HBV recurrence and are being evaluated in clinical trials. Subcutaneous HBIG and hyperimmune anti-HBs plasma may prove to be alternative options with a lower cost and the same efficacy levels. The optimal antiviral therapy has not been established yet for LT or RT candidates with CHC. The DAAs institution marks a bright new era for treatment approach of these patients. Control randomized studies involving DAAs use in patients with decompensated cirrhosis and in RT candidates and recipients are in high need. Moreover, the optimal use and benefits of granulocyte growth factors and erythropoietin in improving SVR rates should be further researched and become established practice.
Footnotes
P- Reviewers: Hilmi IA, Schemmer P, Saeed T S- Editor: Song XX L- Editor: Roemmele A E- Editor: Wang CH
References
- 1.Pham PT, Pham PA, Pham PC, Parikh S, Danovitch G. Evaluation of adult kidney transplant candidates. Semin Dial. 2010;23:595–605. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-139X.2010.00809.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shibolet O, Ilan Y, Gillis S, Hubert A, Shouval D, Safadi R. Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers. Blood. 2002;100:391–396. doi: 10.1182/blood.v100.2.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E, Archimandritis AJ, Burroughs AK. Current management of hepatitis B virus infection before and after liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2009;29:1294–1305. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2009.02085.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Samuel D. Management of hepatitis B in liver transplantation patients. Semin Liver Dis. 2004;24 Suppl 1:55–62. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heathcote EJ, Marcellin P, Buti M, Gane E, De Man RA, Krastev Z, Germanidis G, Lee SS, Flisiak R, Kaita K, et al. Three-year efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment for chronic hepatitis B. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:132–143. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schiff E, Simsek H, Lee WM, Chao YC, Sette H, Janssen HL, Han SH, Goodman Z, Yang J, Brett-Smith H, et al. Efficacy and safety of entecavir in patients with chronic hepatitis B and advanced hepatic fibrosis or cirrhosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:2776–2783. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02086.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Papatheodoridis GV, Manolakopoulos S, Dusheiko G, Archimandritis AJ. Therapeutic strategies in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection. Lancet Infect Dis. 2008;8:167–178. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(07)70264-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.McGovern BH, Abu Dayyeh BK, Chung RT. Avoiding therapeutic pitfalls: the rational use of specifically targeted agents against hepatitis C infection. Hepatology. 2008;48:1700–1712. doi: 10.1002/hep.22563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stedman CA. Current prospects for interferon-free treatment of hepatitis C in 2012. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:38–45. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Garg V, van Heeswijk R, Lee JE, Alves K, Nadkarni P, Luo X. Effect of telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine and tacrolimus. Hepatology. 2011;54:20–27. doi: 10.1002/hep.24443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Verna EC, Brown RS. Hepatitis C virus and liver transplantation. Clin Liver Dis. 2006;10:919–940. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2006.08.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bzowej N, Nelson DR, Terrault NA, Everson GT, Teng LL, Prabhakar A, Charlton MR. PHOENIX: A randomized controlled trial of peginterferon alfa-2a plus ribavirin as a prophylactic treatment after liver transplantation for hepatitis C virus. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:528–538. doi: 10.1002/lt.22271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Roche B, Samuel D. Hepatitis C virus treatment pre- and post-liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2012;32 Suppl 1:120–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02714.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zimmerman MA, Ghobrial RM, Tong MJ, Hiatt JR, Cameron AM, Busuttil RW. Antiviral prophylaxis and recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma following liver transplantation in patients with hepatitis B. Transplant Proc. 2007;39:3276–3280. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2007.07.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Papatheodoridis GV, Sevastianos V, Burroughs AK. Prevention of and treatment for hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation in the nucleoside analogues era. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:250–258. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00063.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Kanwal F, Dulai G. HBsAg seropositive status and survival after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:2913–2921. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Picciotto FP, Tritto G, Lanza AG, Addario L, De Luca M, Di Costanzo GG, Lampasi F, Tartaglione MT, Marsilia GM, Calise F, et al. Sustained virological response to antiviral therapy reduces mortality in HCV reinfection after liver transplantation. J Hepatol. 2007;46:459–465. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2006.10.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Roche B, Sebagh M, Canfora ML, Antonini T, Roque-Afonso AM, Delvart V, Saliba F, Duclos-Vallee JC, Castaing D, Samuel D. Hepatitis C virus therapy in liver transplant recipients: response predictors, effect on fibrosis progression, and importance of the initial stage of fibrosis. Liver Transpl. 2008;14:1766–1777. doi: 10.1002/lt.21635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ramachandran P, Fraser A, Agarwal K, Austin A, Brown A, Foster GR, Fox R, Hayes PC, Leen C, Mills PR, et al. UK consensus guidelines for the use of the protease inhibitors boceprevir and telaprevir in genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infected patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35:647–662. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2012.04992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Chan HL, Chen YC, Gane EJ, Sarin SK, Suh DJ, Piratvisuth T, Prabhakar B, Hwang SG, Choudhuri G, Safadi R, et al. Randomized clinical trial: efficacy and safety of telbivudine and lamivudine in treatment-naïve patients with HBV-related decompensated cirrhosis. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19:732–743. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2012.01600.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Fontana RJ, Hann HW, Perrillo RP, Vierling JM, Wright T, Rakela J, Anschuetz G, Davis R, Gardner SD, Brown NA. Determinants of early mortality in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B treated with antiviral therapy. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:719–727. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.35352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liaw YF, Raptopoulou-Gigi M, Cheinquer H, Sarin SK, Tanwandee T, Leung N, Peng CY, Myers RP, Brown RS, Jeffers L, et al. Efficacy and safety of entecavir versus adefovir in chronic hepatitis B patients with hepatic decompensation: a randomized, open-label study. Hepatology. 2011;54:91–100. doi: 10.1002/hep.24361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Fontana RJ, Keeffe EB, Carey W, Fried M, Reddy R, Kowdley KV, Soldevila-Pico C, McClure LA, Lok AS. Effect of lamivudine treatment on survival of 309 North American patients awaiting liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Liver Transpl. 2002;8:433–439. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2002.32983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kapoor D, Guptan RC, Wakil SM, Kazim SN, Kaul R, Agarwal SR, Raisuddin S, Hasnain SE, Sarin SK: Beneficial effects of lamivudine in hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2000;33:308–312. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8278(00)80372-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Manolakopoulos S, Karatapanis S, Elefsiniotis J, Mathou N, Vlachogiannakos J, Iliadou E, Kougioumtzan A, Economou M, Triantos C, Tzourmakliotis D, et al. Clinical course of lamivudine monotherapy in patients with decompensated cirrhosis due to HBeAg negative chronic HBV infection. Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;99:57–63. doi: 10.1046/j.1572-0241.2003.04021.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.European Association For The Study Of The Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2009;50:227–242. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liaw YF, Leung N, Kao JH, Piratvisuth T, Gane E, Han KH, Guan R, Lau GK, Locarnini S. Asian-Pacific consensus statement on the management of chronic hepatitis B: a 2008 update. Hepatol Int. 2008;2:263–283. doi: 10.1007/s12072-008-9080-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B: update 2009. Hepatology. 2009;50:661–662. doi: 10.1002/hep.23190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim IS, Mun JI, Koo JH, Kang CJ, Bak JK, Cheong JY, Cho SW. [Entecavir therapy for patients with hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis] Korean J Gastroenterol. 2012;59:224–231. doi: 10.4166/kjg.2012.59.3.224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sadler MD, Coffin CS, Lee SS. Entecavir for the treatment of patients with hepatitis B virus-related decompensated cirrhosis. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14:1363–1369. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2013.786701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ye XG, Su QM. Effects of entecavir and lamivudine for hepatitis B decompensated cirrhosis: meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:6665–6678. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Marcellin P, Gane E, Buti M, Afdhal N, Sievert W, Jacobson IM, Washington MK, Germanidis G, Flaherty JF, Schall RA, et al. Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5-year open-label follow-up study. Lancet. 2013;381:468–475. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61425-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Marcellin P, Heathcote EJ, Buti M, Gane E, de Man RA, Krastev Z, Germanidis G, Lee SS, Flisiak R, Kaita K, et al. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus adefovir dipivoxil for chronic hepatitis B. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2442–2455. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0802878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wong VW, Chan FK. Regression of cirrhosis with long-term tenofovir treatment. Gastroenterology. 2013;145:481–482. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.06.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Liaw YF, Sheen IS, Lee CM, Akarca US, Papatheodoridis GV, Suet-Hing Wong F, Chang TT, Horban A, Wang C, Kwan P, Buti M, Prieto M, Berg T, Kitrinos K, Peschell K, Mondou E, Frederick D, Rousseau F, Schiff ER. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), emtricitabine/TDF, and entecavir in patients with decompensated chronic hepatitis B liver disease. Hepatology. 2011;53:62–72. doi: 10.1002/hep.23952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Izzedine H, Hulot JS, Vittecoq D, Gallant JE, Staszewski S, Launay-Vacher V, Cheng A, Deray G. Long-term renal safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in antiretroviral-naive HIV-1-infected patients. Data from a double-blind randomized active-controlled multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:743–746. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Laprise C, Baril JG, Dufresne S, Trottier H. Association between tenofovir exposure and reduced kidney function in a cohort of HIV-positive patients: results from 10 years of follow-up. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:567–575. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cholongitas E, Vasiliadis T, Antoniadis N, Goulis I, Papanikolaou V, Akriviadis E. Hepatitis B prophylaxis post liver transplantation with newer nucleos(t)ide analogues after hepatitis B immunoglobulin discontinuation. Transpl Infect Dis. 2012;14:479–487. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2012.00741.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.European Association For The Study Of The Liver. EASL clinical practice guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection. J Hepatol. 2012;57:167–185. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Lok AS, McMahon BJ. Chronic hepatitis B. Hepatology. 2007;45:507–539. doi: 10.1002/hep.21513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Parshutin NP, Korsakov SG. Comparative analysis of the data of acupuncture electrodiagnosis and hormonal status of women with oligomenorrhea. Akush Ginekol (Mosk) 1990;(6):26–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Chalasani N, Manzarbeitia C, Ferenci P, Vogel W, Fontana RJ, Voigt M, Riely C, Martin P, Teperman L, Jiao J, et al. Peginterferon alfa-2a for hepatitis C after liver transplantation: two randomized, controlled trials. Hepatology. 2005;41:289–298. doi: 10.1002/hep.20560. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mazzaferro V, Tagger A, Schiavo M, Regalia E, Pulvirenti A, Ribero ML, Coppa J, Romito R, Burgoa L, Zucchini N, et al. Prevention of recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation with early interferon and ribavirin treatment. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1355–1357. doi: 10.1016/s0041-1345(00)02508-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shergill AK, Khalili M, Straley S, Bollinger K, Roberts JP, Ascher NA, Terrault NA. Applicability, tolerability and efficacy of preemptive antiviral therapy in hepatitis C-infected patients undergoing liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2005;5:118–124. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Sugawara Y, Makuuchi M, Matsui Y, Kishi Y, Akamatsu N, Kaneko J, Kokudo N. Preemptive therapy for hepatitis C virus after living-donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2004;78:1308–1311. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000142677.12473.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Selzner N, Guindi M, Renner EL, Berenguer M. Immune-mediated complications of the graft in interferon-treated hepatitis C positive liver transplant recipients. J Hepatol. 2011;55:207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Rubín A, Aguilera V, Berenguer M. Liver transplantation and hepatitis C. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2011;35:805–812. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2011.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Laryea MA, Watt KD. Immunoprophylaxis against and prevention of recurrent viral hepatitis after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:514–523. doi: 10.1002/lt.23408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV. High genetic barrier nucleos(t)ide analogue(s) for prophylaxis from hepatitis B virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Am J Transplant. 2013;13:353–362. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2012.04315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Perrillo R, Buti M, Durand F, Charlton M, Gadano A, Cantisani G, Loong CC, Brown K, Hu W, Lopez-Talavera JC, et al. Entecavir and hepatitis B immune globulin in patients undergoing liver transplantation for chronic hepatitis B. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:887–895. doi: 10.1002/lt.23690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ahn J, Cohen SM. Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence in liver transplant patients using oral antiviral therapy without long-term hepatitis B immunoglobulin. Hepat Mon. 2011;11:638–645. doi: 10.5812/kowsar.1735143X.717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Fung J, Cheung C, Chan SC, Yuen MF, Chok KS, Sharr W, Dai WC, Chan AC, Cheung TT, Tsang S, et al. Entecavir monotherapy is effective in suppressing hepatitis B virus after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2011;141:1212–1219. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.06.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Perrillo R BM, Durand F. Safety and efficacy of entecavir in patients receiving liver transplantation due to chronic hepatitis B. J Hepatol. 2012;56:S212. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Wadhawan M VV, Goyal N, Dargan P, Rastogi M, Vasu F. Living related liver transplant (LRLT) in HBV DNA negative cirrhosis without hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) Hepatol Int. 2011;5:S38. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Cholongitas E, Goulis J, Akriviadis E, Papatheodoridis GV. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin and/or nucleos(t)ide analogues for prophylaxis against hepatitis b virus recurrence after liver transplantation: a systematic review. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:1176–1190. doi: 10.1002/lt.22354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Lake JR. Do we really need long-term hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin? What are the alternatives? Liver Transpl. 2008;14 Suppl 2:S23–S26. doi: 10.1002/lt.21637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Shouval D, Samuel D. Hepatitis B immune globulin to prevent hepatitis B virus graft reinfection following liver transplantation: a concise review. Hepatology. 2000;32:1189–1195. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.19789. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Lenci I, Tisone G, Di Paolo D, Marcuccilli F, Tariciotti L, Ciotti M, Svicher V, Perno CF, Angelico M. Safety of complete and sustained prophylaxis withdrawal in patients liver-transplanted for HBV-related cirrhosis at low risk of HBV recurrence. J Hepatol. 2011;55:587–593. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2010.12.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Berenguer M, Prieto M, Rayón JM, Mora J, Pastor M, Ortiz V, Carrasco D, San Juan F, Burgueño MD, Mir J, et al. Natural history of clinically compensated hepatitis C virus-related graft cirrhosis after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2000;32:852–858. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2000.17924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Gurusamy KS, Tsochatzis E, Xirouchakis E, Burroughs AK, Davidson BR. Antiviral therapy for recurrent liver graft infection with hepatitis C virus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD006803. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006803.pub3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Coilly A, Roche B, Samuel D. Current management and perspectives for HCV recurrence after liver transplantation. Liver Int. 2013;33 Suppl 1:56–62. doi: 10.1111/liv.12062. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology. 1996;24:289–293. doi: 10.1002/hep.510240201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Blasco A, Forns X, Carrión JA, García-Pagán JC, Gilabert R, Rimola A, Miquel R, Bruguera M, García-Valdecasas JC, Bosch J, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient identifies patients at risk of severe hepatitis C recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2006;43:492–499. doi: 10.1002/hep.21090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Carrión JA, Torres F, Crespo G, Miquel R, García-Valdecasas JC, Navasa M, Forns X. Liver stiffness identifies two different patterns of fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C virus recurrence after liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2010;51:23–34. doi: 10.1002/hep.23240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Forman LM, Lewis JD, Berlin JA, Feldman HI, Lucey MR. The association between hepatitis C infection and survival after orthotopic liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2002;122:889–896. doi: 10.1053/gast.2002.32418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Fukuhara T, Taketomi A, Motomura T, Okano S, Ninomiya A, Abe T, Uchiyama H, Soejima Y, Shirabe K, Matsuura Y, et al. Variants in IL28B in liver recipients and donors correlate with response to peg-interferon and ribavirin therapy for recurrent hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2010;139:1577–1585, 1585 e1571-1573. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.07.058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Gane EJ. The natural history of recurrent hepatitis C and what influences this. Liver Transpl. 2008;14 Suppl 2:S36–S44. doi: 10.1002/lt.21646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Humar A, Kumar D, Raboud J, Caliendo AM, Moussa G, Levy G, Mazzulli T. Interactions between cytomegalovirus, human herpesvirus-6, and the recurrence of hepatitis C after liver transplantation. Am J Transplant. 2002;2:461–466. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2002.20511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Berenguer M. Systematic review of the treatment of established recurrent hepatitis C with pegylated interferon in combination with ribavirin. J Hepatol. 2008;49:274–287. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.05.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Wang CS, Ko HH, Yoshida EM, Marra CA, Richardson K. Interferon-based combination anti-viral therapy for hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation: a review and quantitative analysis. Am J Transplant. 2006;6:1586–1599. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2006.01362.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Xirouchakis E, Triantos C, Manousou P, Sigalas A, Calvaruso V, Corbani A, Leandro G, Patch D, Burroughs A. Pegylated-interferon and ribavirin in liver transplant candidates and recipients with HCV cirrhosis: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective controlled studies. J Viral Hepat. 2008;15:699–709. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2008.01019.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Coilly A, Roche B, Dumortier J, Leroy V, Botta-Fridlund D, Radenne S, Pageaux GP, Si-Ahmed SN, Guillaud O, Antonini TM, et al. Safety and efficacy of protease inhibitors to treat hepatitis C after liver transplantation: a multicenter experience. J Hepatol. 2014;60:78–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Pungpapong S, Aqel BA, Koning L, Murphy JL, Henry TM, Ryland KL, Yataco ML, Satyanarayana R, Rosser BG, Vargas HE, et al. Multicenter experience using telaprevir or boceprevir with peginterferon and ribavirin to treat hepatitis C genotype 1 after liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2013;19:690–700. doi: 10.1002/lt.23669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Werner CR, Egetemeyr DP, Lauer UM, Nadalin S, Königsrainer A, Malek NP, Berg CP. Telaprevir-based triple therapy in liver transplant patients with hepatitis C virus: a 12-week pilot study providing safety and efficacy data. Liver Transpl. 2012;18:1464–1470. doi: 10.1002/lt.23542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Stravitz T LJ, Dodge J, Saxena V, Burton J, Verna E, O’Leary J, Parikh N, Everson G, Brown R, Trotter J, et al. Higher Sustained Virologic Response (SVR-12) Achievable in Liver Transplant (LT) Recipients with Hepatitis C (HCV) Treated with Protease Inhibitor (PI) Triple Therapy (TT) Hepatology. 2013:58 (4 suppl). [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ann Brown K FR, Russo M, Levitsky J, Yoshida E, Vargas H, Bsharat M, Rubin R, Brown R : Twice -daily Telaprevir in combination with Peginterferon alfa 2α/ribavirin in genotype 1 HCV Liver Transplant recipients: Interim week 16 Safety and Efficacy Results on the Prospective, Multicenter REFRESH Study. Hepatology. 2013;58:AASLD abstracts. [Google Scholar]
- 77.Forns X FR, Moonka D, McHutchison J, Symonds W, Denning J, McNair L, Chang P, Kivett V, Shiffman M, Charlton M. Initial evaluation of Sofosbuvir compassionate use program for patients with severe recurrent HCV following liver transplantation. Hepatology. 2013;58(4 suppl):1084 AASLD abstracts. doi: 10.1002/hep.27681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Manousou P, Samonakis D, Cholongitas E, Patch D, O’Beirne J, Dhillon AP, Rolles K, McCormick A, Hayes P, Burroughs AK. Outcome of recurrent hepatitis C virus after liver transplantation in a randomized trial of tacrolimus monotherapy versus triple therapy. Liver Transpl. 2009;15:1783–1791. doi: 10.1002/lt.21907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Samonakis DN, Cholongitas E, Triantos CK, Griffiths P, Dhillon AP, Thalheimer U, Patch DW, Burroughs AK. Sustained, spontaneous disappearance of serum HCV-RNA under immunosuppression after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2005;43:1091–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Chan TM, Fang GX, Tang CS, Cheng IK, Lai KN, Ho SK. Preemptive lamivudine therapy based on HBV DNA level in HBsAg-positive kidney allograft recipients. Hepatology. 2002;36:1246–1252. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.36156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Maluf DG, Fisher RA, King AL, Gibney EM, Mas VR, Cotterell AH, Shiffman ML, Sterling RK, Behnke M, Posner MP. Hepatitis C virus infection and kidney transplantation: predictors of patient and graft survival. Transplantation. 2007;83:853–857. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000259725.96694.0a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Ridruejo E, Adrover R, Cocozzella D, Reggiardo MV, Fernández N. Effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin in urban minority patients. Hepatology. 2010;51:2231; author reply 2231–2232. doi: 10.1002/hep.23714. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Santos L, Alves R, Macario F, Parada B, Campos M, Mota A. Impact of hepatitis B and C virus infections on kidney transplantation: a single center experience. Transplant Proc. 2009;41:880–882. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.01.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Fabrizi F, Poordad FF, Martin P. Hepatitis C infection and the patient with end-stage renal disease. Hepatology. 2002;36:3–10. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2002.34613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Strader DB, Wright T, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C. Hepatology. 2004;39:1147–1171. doi: 10.1002/hep.20119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Pipili CL, Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas EC. Treatment of hepatitis B in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;84:880–885. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fabrizi F, Aghemo A, Messa P. Hepatitis C treatment in patients with kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2013;84:874–879. doi: 10.1038/ki.2013.264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Chopra A, Cantarovich M, Bain VG. Simultaneous liver and kidney transplants: optimizing use of this double resource. Transplantation. 2011;91:1305–1309. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e31821bad1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Numata A, Akimoto T, Toshima M, Iwazu Y, Otani N, Miki T, Sugase T, Saito O, Hamano Y, Takemoto F, et al. Membranous nephropathy in an HIV-positive patient complicated with hepatitis B virus infection. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2011;15:769–773. doi: 10.1007/s10157-011-0477-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Olsen SK, Brown RS. Hepatitis B treatment: Lessons for the nephrologist. Kidney Int. 2006;70:1897–1904. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5001908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.KDIGO clinical practice guideline for the care of kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2009;9 Suppl 3:S1–S155. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02834.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Fabrizi F BS, Martin P. Kidney transplantation and liver disease. In: Handbook of Kidney transplantation Edited by Danovitch G., editor. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins; 2010. pp. 280–290. [Google Scholar]
- 93.KDIGO clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of hepatitis C in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2008;(109):S1–S99. doi: 10.1038/ki.2008.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Mallet V, Gilgenkrantz H, Serpaggi J, Verkarre V, Vallet-Pichard A, Fontaine H, Pol S. Brief communication: the relationship of regression of cirrhosis to outcome in chronic hepatitis C. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:399–403. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-149-6-200809160-00006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Schmitz V, Kiessling A, Bahra M, Puhl G, Kahl A, Berg T, Neuhaus R, Neuhaus P, Neumann U. Peginterferon alfa-2b plus ribavirin for the treatment of hepatitis C recurrence following combined liver and kidney transplantation. Ann Transplant. 2007;12:22–27. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Tseng PL, Chen TC, Chien YS, Hung CH, Yen YH, Chang KC, Tsai MC, Lin MT, Lee CT, Shen CH, et al. Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2b and ribavirin combination therapy versus pegylated interferon monotherapy in hemodialysis patients: a comparison of 2 sequentially treated cohorts. Am J Kidney Dis. 2013;62:789–795. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.03.037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Fabrizi F, Dixit V, Martin P, Messa P. Combined antiviral therapy of hepatitis C virus in dialysis patients: meta-analysis of clinical trials. J Viral Hepat. 2011;18:e263–e269. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2893.2010.01405.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Dumortier J, Guillaud O, Gagnieu MC, Janbon B, Juillard L, Morelon E, Leroy V. Anti-viral triple therapy with telaprevir in haemodialysed HCV patients: is it feasible? J Clin Virol. 2013;56:146–149. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2012.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Knapstein J, Galle PR, Zimmermann T. Antiviral triple therapy with boceprevir in a chronic hepatitis C haemodialysis patient awaiting kidney re-transplantation. Dig Liver Dis. 2014;46:88–89. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2013.08.133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Periera BJ, Wright TL, Schmid CH, Levey AS. The impact of pretransplantation hepatitis C infection on the outcome of renal transplantation. Transplantation. 1995;60:799–805. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Toth CM, Pascual M, Chung RT, Graeme-Cook F, Dienstag JL, Bhan AK, Cosimi AB. Hepatitis C virus-associated fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis after renal transplantation: response to interferon-alpha therapy. Transplantation. 1998;66:1254–1258. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199811150-00023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Kamar N, Milioto O, Alric L, El Kahwaji L, Cointault O, Lavayssière L, Sauné K, Izopet J, Rostaing L. Entecavir therapy for adefovir-resistant hepatitis B virus infection in kidney and liver allograft recipients. Transplantation. 2008;86:611–614. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181806c8c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Tse KC, Yap DY, Tang CS, Yung S, Chan TM. Response to adefovir or entecavir in renal allograft recipients with hepatitic flare due to lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B. Clin Transplant. 2010;24:207–212. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0012.2009.01090.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Ridruejo E AR, Alonso C, Mandó OG, Silva MO Entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in end stage renal disease and kidney transplantation. Dial Transplant. 2010;(39):397–400. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Yap DY, Tang CS, Yung S, Choy BY, Yuen MF, Chan TM. Long-term outcome of renal transplant recipients with chronic hepatitis B infection-impact of antiviral treatments. Transplantation. 2010;90:325–330. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181e5b811. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Ridruejo E, Adrover R, Mandó OG, Silva MO. Entecavir in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in kidney transplantation. J Hepatol. 2012;56:997–998; author reply 999. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.09.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Chan TM, Tse KC, Tang CS, Lai KN, Ho SK. Prospective study on lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B in renal allograft recipients. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:1103–1109. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2004.00467.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Daudé M, Rostaing L, Sauné K, Lavayssière L, Basse G, Esposito L, Guitard J, Izopet J, Alric L, Kamar N. Tenofovir therapy in hepatitis B virus-positive solid-organ transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2011;91:916–920. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182100f59. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Amarapurkar DN, Patel N. Increased eGFR with telbivudine in combination therapy of chronic hepatitis B infection. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2014;33:89–91. doi: 10.1007/s12664-013-0325-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Piratvisuth T, Komolmit P, Tanwandee T, Sukeepaisarnjaroen W, Chan HL, Pessôa MG, Fassio E, Ono SK, Bessone F, Daruich J, et al. 52-week efficacy and safety of telbivudine with conditional tenofovir intensification at week 24 in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. PLoS One. 2013;8:e54279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Wang Y, Thongsawat S, Gane EJ, Liaw YF, Jia J, Hou J, Chan HL, Papatheodoridis G, Wan M, Niu J, et al. Efficacy and safety of continuous 4-year telbivudine treatment in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J Viral Hepat. 2013;20:e37–e46. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335–1374. doi: 10.1002/hep.22759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Baid S, Cosimi AB, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Colvin RB, Williams WW, Pascual M. Renal disease associated with hepatitis C infection after kidney and liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;70:255–261. doi: 10.1097/00007890-200007270-00001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Baid S, Tolkoff-Rubin N, Saidman S, Chung R, Williams WW, Auchincloss H, Colvin RB, Delmonico FL, Cosimi AB, Pascual M. Acute humoral rejection in hepatitis C-infected renal transplant recipients receiving antiviral therapy. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:74–78. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.30113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.Peng CY, Chien RN, Liaw YF. Hepatitis B virus-related decompensated liver cirrhosis: benefits of antiviral therapy. J Hepatol. 2012;57:442–450. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.02.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Vezali E, Aghemo A, Colombo M: A review of the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection in cirrhosis. Clin Ther. 2010;32:2117–2138. doi: 10.1016/S0149-2918(11)00022-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Vallet-Pichard A, Pol S. Hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2013;37:340–346. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2013.03.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.Fontaine H, Vallet-Pichard A, Equi-Andrade C, Nalpas B, Verkarre V, Chaix ML, Lebray P, Sobesky R, Serpaggi J, Kreis H, et al. Histopathologic efficacy of ribavirin monotherapy in kidney allograft recipients with chronic hepatitis C. Transplantation. 2004;78:853–857. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000128911.87538.aa. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Mahmoud IM, Sobh MA, El-Habashi AF, Sally ST, El-Baz M, El-Sawy E, Ghoneim MA. Interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C: study of tolerance, efficacy and post-transplantation course. Nephron Clin Pract. 2005;100:c133–c139. doi: 10.1159/000085442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Ozdemir BH, Ozdemir FN, Sezer S, Colak T, Haberal M. De novo glomerulonephritis in renal allografts with hepatitis C virus infection. Transplant Proc. 2006;38:492–495. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.12.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Recommendations for incorporating human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention into the medical care of persons living with HIV. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;38:104–121. doi: 10.1086/380131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Pipili C, Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis G. Review article: nucleos(t)ide analogues in patients with chronic hepatitis B virus infection and chronic kidney disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014;39:35–46. doi: 10.1111/apt.12538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Cholongitas E, Papatheodoridis GV, Burroughs AK. Liver grafts from anti-hepatitis B core positive donors: a systematic review. J Hepatol. 2010;52:272–279. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2009.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bortoluzzi I, Gambato M, Albertoni L, Mescoli C, Pacenti M, Cusinato R, Germani G, Senzolo M, Rugge M, Boccagni P, et al. Use of grafts from anti-HBc-positive donors in liver transplantation: a 5-year, single-center experience. Transplant Proc. 2013;45:2707–2710. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2013.07.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Franchello A, Ghisetti V, Marzano A, Romagnoli R, Salizzoni M. Transplantation of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive livers into hepatitis B virus-positive recipients and the role of hepatitis delta coinfection. Liver Transpl. 2005;11:922–928. doi: 10.1002/lt.20471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Li Z, Hu Z, Xiang J, Zhou J, Yan S, Wu J, Zhou L, Zheng S. Use of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive grafts in liver transplantation: a matched analysis of the US National database. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:35–45. doi: 10.1002/lt.23774. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Loggi E, Micco L, Ercolani G, Cucchetti A, Bihl FK, Grazi GL, Gitto S, Bontadini A, Bernardi M, Grossi P, et al. Liver transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen positive donors: a safe way to expand the donor pool. J Hepatol. 2012;56:579–585. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Choi Y, Choi JY, Yi NJ, Lee K, Mori S, Hong G, Kim H, Park MS, Yoo T, Suh SW, et al. Liver transplantation for HBsAg-positive recipients using grafts from HBsAg-positive deceased donors. Transpl Int. 2013;26:1173–1183. doi: 10.1111/tri.12177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.De Feo TM, Grossi P, Poli F, Mozzi F, Messa P, Minetti E, Sandrini S, Boschiero L, Rigotti P, Maresca C, et al. Kidney transplantation from anti-HBc+ donors: results from a retrospective Italian study. Transplantation. 2006;81:76–80. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000189930.89031.1b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Jiang H, Wu J, Zhang X, Wu D, Huang H, He Q, Wang R, Wang Y, Zhang J, Chen J. Kidney transplantation from hepatitis B surface antigen positive donors into hepatitis B surface antibody positive recipients: a prospective nonrandomized controlled study from a single center. Am J Transplant. 2009;9:1853–1858. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2009.02707.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Berber I, Aydin C, Yigit B, Turkmen F, Titiz IM, Altaca G. The effect of HBsAg-positivity of kidney donors on long-term patient and graft outcome. Transplant Proc. 2005;37:4173–4175. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2005.10.094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Álvaro E, Abradelo M, Fuertes A, Manrique A, Colina F, Alegre C, Calvo J, García M, García-Sesma A, Cambra F, et al. Liver transplantation from anti-hepatitis C virus-positive donors: our experience. Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1475–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Ballarin R, Cucchetti A, Spaggiari M, Montalti R, Di Benedetto F, Nadalin S, Troisi RI, Valmasoni M, Longo C, De Ruvo N, et al. Long-term follow-up and outcome of liver transplantation from anti-hepatitis C virus-positive donors: a European multicentric case-control study. Transplantation. 2011;91:1265–1272. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e318219eb8f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Abbott KC, Lentine KL, Bucci JR, Agodoa LY, Peters TG, Schnitzler MA. The impact of transplantation with deceased donor hepatitis c-positive kidneys on survival in wait-listed long-term dialysis patients. Am J Transplant. 2004;4:2032–2037. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-6143.2004.00606.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Sureshkumar KK, Thai NL, Marcus RJ. Kidney transplantation in hepatitis C-positive recipients: does type of induction influence outcomes? Transplant Proc. 2012;44:1262–1264. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.12.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Flohr TR, Bonatti H, Hranjec T, Keith DS, Lobo PI, Kumer SC, Schmitt TM, Sawyer RG, Pruett TL, Roberts JP, et al. Elderly recipients of hepatitis C positive renal allografts can quickly develop liver disease. J Surg Res. 2012;176:629–638. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.10.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Pereira BJ, Wright TL, Schmid CH, Levey AS. A controlled study of hepatitis C transmission by organ transplantation. The New England Organ Bank Hepatitis C Study Group. Lancet. 1995;345:484–487. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90583-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]