Skip to main content
. 2014 May 28;20(20):5987–5998. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.5987

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies using radiofrequency ablation as a pretransplantation bridge therapy

Ref. n Tumor size (cm) RFA→LT interval (mo) Dropout Radiologic response necrosis Pathologic response necrosis Satellites found in explants Follow-up after LT (mo) Survival
1-yr 3-yr
Pulvirenti et al[34] 14 3.50 8.0 0.0% 90.7% 86.4% 57.0% 16.0 100.0% 100.0%
Fontana et al[35] 33 3.60 7.9 21.7% 66.0% - - 26.9 85.0% 85.0%
Mazzaferro et al[36] 50 2.75 9.5 0.0% 70.0% 55.0% 28.0% 22.0 95.0% 83.0%
Pompili et al[37] 40 2.80 8.6 0.0% 75.0% 46.7% 14.0% 34.4 91.9% 85.4%
Lu et al[38] 52 2.50 8.7 5.8% 89.6% 70.3% 24.0% 14.9 85.0% 76.0%
Brillet et al[39] 21 2.40 11.9 24.0% 76.0% 75.0% 44.0% 25.0 - -
DuBay et al[40] 77 2.50 9.5 21.0% 83.0% - - 30.0 -1 -1
1

No significant difference compared with untreated groups. LT: Liver transplantation; RFA: Radiofrequency ablation.