Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014 Jun;61(6):966–978. doi: 10.1109/TUFFC.2014.2992

Fig. 7.

Fig. 7

In vivo cavitation SNR using (a) 100-cycle and (b) 5000-cycle pulses. The error bar shows the standard deviation. The cavitation SNR using 100-cycle pulses increased with pressure. When using 5000-cycle pulses, the SNR of the SCDu and ICD increased with pressure, while it for the SCDh reached plateau due to the nonlinear effect of the skull at high pressures.