Table 5. Comparison of the length/with ratio of the xiphiplastron in selected specimens referred to P. etalloni, C. picteti, and C. jaccardi.
Xiphiplastron length (mm) |
Xiphiplastron width (mm) |
Ratio | |
---|---|---|---|
Plesiochelys etalloni | |||
NMS 59 | 89 | 66 | 1.35 |
NMS 78 | 84a | 66 | 1.27 |
NMS 79 | 81 | 59 | 1.37 |
NMS 116 | – | – | – |
NMS 669 | 79 | 68 | 1.16 |
NMS 675 | 84 | 66b | 1.27 |
MAJ 2005-11-1 | 90c | 68c | 1.32 |
Craspedochelys jaccardi | |||
NMS 101 | 62d | 70 | 0.89 |
NMS 102a | – | – | – |
NMS 612 | – | – | – |
NMS 673 | 66 | 64 | 1.03 |
MHNN FOS 977 | 55 | 55 | 1.00 |
Craspedochelys picteti | |||
NMS 608 | – | – | – |
Notes.
Length incomplete.
Width incomplete.
From 3D surface mesh (see Anquetin, Deschamps & Claude, 2014).
Length missing about 10 mm.