Table 3.
Hamburg Quality of Life in MS results. The average score of the five subscales was weighed evenly to calculate the HAQUAMS averages used in analysis. Lower scores reflect more positive ratings.
| Group | Group 1 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Assessment 1 | Assessment 2 | Assessment 3 | Effect size | Effect size | ||||
| M | (SD) | M | (SD) | M | (SD) | A1 − A2 | A2 − A3 | |
| Lower severity (N = 8) | 73.25 | (17.20) | 72.88 | (16.37) | 71.75 | (13.49) | .02 | .08 |
| Higher severity (N = 5) | 91.20 | (22.04) | 82.80 | (22.95) | 86.40 | (24.87) | .37 | −.15 |
| Group 1 total (N = 13) | 80.15 | (20.42) | 76.69 | (18.91) | 77.38 | (19.16) | .18 | −.04 |
|
| ||||||||
| Group | Group 2 | |||||||
| Assessment 1 | Assessment 2 | Assessment 3 | Effect size | Effect size | ||||
| M | (SD) | M | (SD) | M | (SD) | A1 − A2 | A2 − A3 | |
|
| ||||||||
| Lower severity (N = 4) | 72.25 | (30.08) | 74.25 | (33.25) | 71.50 | (21.89) | −.06 | .10 |
| Higher severity (N = 7) | 82.86 | (12.64) | 83.71 | (13.23) | 83.14 | (13.09) | −.07 | .04 |
| Group 2 total (N = 11) | 80.09 | (19.55) | 80.27 | (21.44) | 78.91 | (17.73) | −.01 | .07 |