Table 3.
Comparison of CV and Other Parameters (Visual Assessment, SUVmax, Longest Diameter, HUmax) Using the Known Cutoff in Determining Metastatic LNs
Pathologic finding | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Metastasis | Benign | Total | ||
18F-FDG PET—visual analysis | Definitely positive | 42 (80.8 %) | 14 (33.3 %) | 56 (59.6 %) |
Faintly positive | 8 (15.4 %) | 24 (57.1 %) | 32 (34.0 %) | |
Negative | 2 (3.8 %) | 4 (9.5 %) | 6 (6.4 %) | |
Total | 52 | 42 | 94 | |
18F-FDG PET parameter—SUVmaxa | ≥2.5 | 51 TP | 40 FP | 91 |
<2.5 | 1 FN | 2 TN | 3 | |
Total | 52 | 42 | 94 | |
CT parameter—longest diametera | >10 mm | 51 TP | 34 FP | 85 |
≤10 mm | 1 FN | 8 TN | 9 | |
Total | 52 | 42 | 94 | |
CT parameter—HUa | ≤120 | 28 TP | 13 FP | 41 |
>120 | 24 FN | 29 TN | 53 | |
Total | 52 | 42 | 94 | |
18F-FDG PET parameter—CVa | >0.2 | 46 TP | 10 FP | 56 |
≤2.0 | 6 FN | 32 TN | 38 | |
Total | 52 | 42 | 94 |
TP true positive, FP false positive, TN true negative, FN false negative
aSUVmax of ≥2.5, diameter of >1.0 cm, HUmax ≤120, CV >0.20 were used as cutoff value