Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 21;47(4):232–241. doi: 10.1007/s13139-013-0216-6

Table 3.

Comparison of CV and Other Parameters (Visual Assessment, SUVmax, Longest Diameter, HUmax) Using the Known Cutoff in Determining Metastatic LNs

Pathologic finding
Metastasis Benign Total
18F-FDG PET—visual analysis Definitely positive 42 (80.8 %) 14 (33.3 %) 56 (59.6 %)
Faintly positive 8 (15.4 %) 24 (57.1 %) 32 (34.0 %)
Negative 2 (3.8 %) 4 (9.5 %) 6 (6.4 %)
Total 52 42 94
18F-FDG PET parameter—SUVmaxa ≥2.5 51 TP 40 FP 91
<2.5 1 FN 2 TN 3
Total 52 42 94
CT parameter—longest diametera >10 mm 51 TP 34 FP 85
≤10 mm 1 FN 8 TN 9
Total 52 42 94
CT parameter—HUa ≤120 28 TP 13 FP 41
>120 24 FN 29 TN 53
Total 52 42 94
18F-FDG PET parameter—CVa >0.2 46 TP 10 FP 56
≤2.0 6 FN 32 TN 38
Total 52 42 94

TP true positive, FP false positive, TN true negative, FN false negative

aSUVmax of ≥2.5, diameter of >1.0 cm, HUmax ≤120, CV >0.20 were used as cutoff value