Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 17;47(1):36–43. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0181-5

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Reduction rates of the indices (a, MTV; b, TLG; c, SUVmax) in responders and nonresponders classified by the Miller and Payne system. Reduction rate (RR) of MTV and TLG were significantly higher in responders than in nonresponders (P = 0.0007, P = 0.002) but SUVmax reduction rate was not (P = 0.08); R = responders; NR = nonresponders; * = P < 0.05