Skip to main content
. 2014 May 27;9(5):e96470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096470

Table 4. Comparison of pure DNA yield and purity, obtained from four strains of E. siliculosus by two different methods: the new and old [47].

Strain Starting Material Weight (mg fresh tissue) A260/280 A260/230 DNA conc. (ng/µl) Total DNA (µg)(a) DNA Yield
(µg/mg)
New Old New Old New Old New Old New Old
Polluted REP 10.11 25 2.01±0.01 1.66±0.01 2.20±0.04 1.37±0.01 132.9±11.3 45.0±2.53 5.31±0.46 1.8±0.18 0.212±0.018* 0.071±0.006
50 1.91±0.01 1.54±0.04 2.00±0.01 1.17±0.02 181.4±15.6 69.3±2.76 7.24±0.60 2.79±0.27 0.145±0.012* 0.056±0.009
100 1.86±0.01 1.59±0.03 1.86±0.02 1.15±0.01 389.6±5.9 123.3±4.34 15.56±0.24 4.94±0.48 0.156±0.002* 0.049±0.006
EC 524 25 1.96±0.03 1.59±0.01 1.75±0.02 1.36±0.01 96.5±5.6 58.0±2.51 3.86±0.42 2.32±0.45 0.155±0.015* 0.093±0.013
50 1.92±0.01 1.60±0.02 1.66±0.03 1.27±0.01 213.4±10.6 124.3±5.43 8.54±0.55 4.98±0.84 0.171±0.017* 0.099±0.014
100 1.85±0.02 1.56±0.02 1.65±0.03 1.15±0.01 314.6±5.7 139.5±4.82 12.56±0.75 5.57±0.62 0.126±0.016* 0.056±0.006
Pristine LIA 4A 25 1.91±0.01 1.25±0.02 1.76±0.02 1.61±0.01 274.7±16.6 226.2±6.92 10.97±0.42 9.04±0.58 0.438±0.029* 0.36±0.009
50 1.87±0.01 1.19±0.01 1.73±0.02 1.62±0.02 357.1±7.5 332.0±7.43 14.26±0.96 13.26±1.34 0.284±0.024 0.26±0.007
100 1.81±0.02 1.20±0.02 1.73±0.02 1.59±0.02 653.9±40.8 515.4±5.73 26.14±1.28 20.62±2.65 0.261±0.031* 0.21±0.008
RHO 12 25 1.83±0.02 1.25±0.03 1.63±0.01 0.69±0.02 207.6±2.62 93.5±3.23 8.30±0.11 3.74±0.83 0.332±0.004* 0.15±0.009
50 1.80±0.01 1.19±0.02 1.60±0.01 0.67±0.02 307.2±15.2 157.9±2.11 12.28±0.61 6.33±0.95 0.246±0.012* 0.13±0.01
100 1.80±0.02 1.15±0.03 1.61±0.01 0.63±0.01 390.6±52.1 253.0±2.43 15.60±2.08 10.10±2.41 0.156±0.020 0.10±0.01

Total amounts of nucleic acids were calculated in a final volume of 40 µL.

(a)

Data are reported as means ± SE from five independent nucleic acid extractions, for both methods. ‘New’ refers to the method developed in this study; ‘Old’ refers to a previously published protocol based on CTAB extraction buffer. According to one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey Test at 95% confidence interval, an asterisk (*) indicates the significantly differences between the yields of the two methods.