Table 3. Comparison of kinetics and kinematic variables with regards to the suspension system type in the prosthetic limb.
Parameter | Suspension type | P value | Effect size | ||
Mean (95% CI) | |||||
Seal-In | Pin/lock | MPSS | |||
Step length (m) | 0.61 | 0.62 | 0.60 | 0.817 | 0.03 |
(0.55–0.66) | (0.54–0.69) | (0.51–0.67) | |||
Cadence (step/min) | 95.2 | 95.70 | 95.06 | 0.844 | 0.14 |
(94.02–96.41) | (94.13–97.25) | (93.37–96.75) | |||
Velocity (m/s) | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.98 | 0.075 | 0.23 |
(0.91–0.98) | (0.86–0.96) | (0.95–1.01) | |||
Stride length (m) | 1.21 | 1.12 | 1.08 | 0.118 | 0.16 |
(1.14–1.29) | (1.03–1.20) | (0.95–1.22) | |||
Stance time (% of gait cycle) | 62.28 | 61.73 | 62.50 | 0.062 | 0.39 |
(60.89–63.70) | (59.74–61.73) | (61.19–63.42) | |||
Swing time (% of gait cycle) | 37.70 | 38.30 | 37.56 | 0.435 | 0.06 |
(65.60–67.80) | (36.95–39.65) | (36.39–38.73) | |||
Vertical GRF, 1st peak (%BW) | 99.68 | 104.22a ,c | 96.42b | <0.001 * | 0.52 |
(97.15–102.22) | (101.58–106.87) | (91.84–101.02) | |||
Vertical GRF, 2nd peak (%BW) | 102.63 | 99.09 | 91.69a , b | <0.001 * | 0.61 |
(100.19–105.06) | (96.34–101.85) | (88.51–94.87) | |||
Fore-aft GRF, 1st peak (%BW) | 5.45 | 4.66a | 4.11a , b | 0.003 * | 0.65 |
(4.79–6.12) | (3.98–5.35) | (3.43–4.80) | |||
Fore-aft GRF, 2nd peak (%BW) | −8.02 | −8.11 | −7.41 | 0.095 | 0.34 |
(−8.76–−7.43) | (−8.91–−7.31) | (−8.13–−6.69) | |||
Hip position-initial contact | 32.8 | 33.11 | 33.04 | 0.931 | 0.006 |
(30.95–34.65) | (31.04–35.17) | (31.08–35) | |||
Max Hip Ext | 3.06 | 2.62 | 2.5 | 0.210 | 0.12 |
(2.71–3.42) | (2.18–3.05) | (1.97–3.04) | |||
Hip ROM | 37.31 | 36.13 | 36.7 | 0.278 | 0.10 |
(35.83–38.79) | (34.92–37.33) | (35.25–38.16) | |||
Knee position-initial contact | 5.4 | 5.73 | 5.53 | 0.876 | 0.01 |
(4.55–6.25) | (4.9–6.57) | (4.34–6.71) | |||
Max Knee Flex -stance | 13.72 | 12.47 | 12.8 | 0.291 | 0.09 |
(12.59–14.86) | (11.08–13.85) | (11.5–14.19) | |||
Max Knee Flex-swing | 75.40 | 66.92a | 70.81a , b | <0.001 * | 0.60 |
(73.21–77.57) | (64.77–69.08) | (68.7–72.93) | |||
Knee ROM | 70.68 | 61.42a | 58.25a | <0.001 * | 0.79 |
(68.34–73.04) | (58.99–63.81) | (56.55–59.94) | |||
Ankle position-initial contact | −0.81 | 0.27a | −0.6b | 0.001 * | 0.71 |
(−1.21–−0.41) | (0.07–0.46) | (−0.93–−0.28) | |||
Max ankle PF-stance | −7.19 | −5.89 | −3.02a , b | <0.001 * | 0.80 |
(−8.3–−6.07) | (−6.98–−4.81) | (−3.73–−2.31) | |||
Max ankle DF-stance | 14.49 | 15.11 | 14.67 | 0.556 | 0.04 |
(13.34–15.63) | (14.24–15.98) | (13.93–15.41) | |||
Max ankle PF-swing | 0.33 | 1.37a | 1.13a | <0.001 * | 0.76 |
(0.12–0.55) | (1.13–1.67) | (0.93–1.33) | |||
Ankle ROM | 21.73 | 20.8 | 20.69 | 0.417 | 0.07 |
(20.35–23.1) | (19.32–22.43) | (19.55–21.83) |
CI = Confidence interval; PF = plantar flexion; DF = dorsiflexion; Flex = flexion; Ext = extension; ROM = range of motion.
Mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level compared with the Seal-In suspension.
Mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level compared with the pin/lock suspension.
*shows significant differences among the three suspension systems.