Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Sep 11.
Published in final edited form as: Nanomedicine (Lond). 2013 Nov 27;9(9):1311–1326. doi: 10.2217/nnm.13.137

Table 1.

Summary of dendrimer characterization.

Surface Generation Hydrodynamic
diameter (nm)
Zeta-
potential
(mV)
Endotoxin
(EU/ml/100 µg)
Amine (−NH2) 3 4.1 ± 0.1 55.7 ± 0.7 <0.05
4 5.1 ± 0.1 61.9 ± 1.5 <0.05
5 6.5 ± 0.2 56.5 ± 0.7 <0.05
6 8.3 ± 0.1 67.1 ± 2.4 <0.05

Carboxy (−COOH) 5 7.7 ± 0.3 −13.3 ± 1.9 7.20

Hydroxy (−OH) 5 6.6 ± 0.1 17.9 ± 0.5 <0.05

Guanidine 5 8.1 ± 2.5 45.0 ± 3.2 <0.50

Dendrimer hydrodynamic diameter (dynamic light scattering; intensity peak), zeta-potential and endotoxin contamination were analyzed as described in the ‘Materials & methods’ section. The hydrodynamic diameter and zeta-potential data are ± standard deviation. In the limulus amebocyte lysate assay, dendrimers were tested at 1:5, 1:50 and 1:500 dilutions; shown are the data adjusted for the dilution factor.