Table 2.

FP density does not differ across taster status groups.

Division method	Subgroup comparison		P value
Mixture model	Group 1	Group 2	0.810
	Group 1	Group 3	0.137
	Group 2	Group 3	0.267
Tertiles	T1	T2	0.899
	T1	T3	0.651
	T2	T3	0.896
A priori	NT	MT	0.926
	NT	ST	0.351
	MT	ST	0.466
Quartiles	Lower	Middle two	0.737
	Lower	Upper	0.414
	Middle two	Upper	0.750

Pairwise comparison using Tukey’s honestly significant difference test shows no difference in FP across subgroups within each division method.