Skip to main content
. 2014 Jun;133(6):e1632–e1638. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3118

TABLE 2.

Comparison of Reported Maternal Smoking Versus Cotinine Detection as a Predictor of Birth Weight

Model Parameter Estimate (SE) P
Model 1 (n = 1401)
 Intercept 3591.9 (39.4) <.001
 Black race −199.2 (29.5) <.001
 Female gender −111.7 (29.5) <.001
 State
  WA (reference) 0.0
  CA −134.7 (43.3) .002
  MI −166.0 (44.6) <.001
  NY −184.0 (43.2) <.001
 Detectable cotinine −94.6 (31.5) .003
Model 1 R2 = 0.065 (P < .001)
Model 2 (n = 1395)
 Intercept 3594.4 (38.6) <.001
 Black race −219.7 (29.3) <.001
 Female gender −122.2 (29.2) <.001
 State
  WA (reference) 0.0
  CA −145.2 (42.9) .001
  MI −145.4 (44.3) .001
  NY −154.0 (43.0) <.001
 Reported smoking during pregnancy −283.7 (48.7) <.001
Model 2 R2 = 0.081 (P < .001)
Model 3 (n = 1395)
 Intercept 3584.6 (38.6) <.001
 Black race −209.6 (29.3) <.001
 Female gender −114.0 (29.3) <.001
 State
  WA (reference) 0.0
  CA −134.4 (43.0) .002
  MI −144.0 (44.6) .001
  NY −152.0 (43.2) <.001
 Reported smoking during pregnancy and/or cotinine ≥9.0 ng/g −213.5 (41.3) <.001
Model 3 R2 = 0.076 (P < .001)