Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 11;46(9):309–314. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00170.2013

Table 1.

Current experimental and computation models of the microenvironment influence on cell fate

Type of Model Characteristic Being Tested Results Influenced by the Characteristic Reference
Experimental ECM stiffness lineage dependent on stiffness 9, 21, 32, 65
cocultured cells lineage dependent on cocultured cells 66, 67
MMP activity inhibition of MMP activity results in reduced speed and persistence of cell movement 40
Computational MMP activity inhibition of MMP activity results in reduced speed and persistence of cell movement 28
uPA activity cell invasion result of chemotactic and haptotactic reactions 2
proliferation, angiogenesis necrotic core within tumor, high microvascular density at periphery 12
proliferation, migration cancer cells with aggressive phenotypes preferentially migrate 8
migration, chemotaxis hypoxia and heterogeneous ECM result in more aggressive tumor cells 3, 4
oxygen, nutrient levels subpopulation preferentially accounts for tumor growth 34

ECM, extracellular matrix; MMP, matrix metalloproteinase; uPA, urokinase-type plasminogen activator.