Skip to main content
. 2014 May 21;14:229. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-229

Table 2.

Factors associated with ICIT score change (100-point scale) excluding receptivity (Path A), 2003 to 2010 – Multilevel linear regression† (n = 541*)

Level Variables Coeff. p-values
Organizational
Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
 
 
 
Positive
3,590
0,013
 
Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
 
 
 
Positive
2,214
0,179
 
Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action)
 
 
 
Positive
8,371
0,000
Contextual
Coercive influence (proportion of clinics judging positive HSSC actions)
0,080
0,137
 
Normative influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of professional associations)
-0,036
0,544
  Mimetic influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of PHC organizations) 0,033 0,421

†Adjusted for ICIT score (2003), proportion of the population aged 65 and over, proportion of the population with low income, number of general practitioners per 100,000 inhabitants and avoidable mortality rates in the HSSC territory.

*Weighted by the number of FTE physicians in the clinic.