Table 3.
Factors associated with ICIT score change (100-point scale) including receptivity (Paths A and C), 2003 to 2010 – Multilevel linear regression† (n = 541*)
| Level | Coeff. | p-values | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Organizational |
Coercive influence (ref.: Negative or no action) |
|
|
| |
Positive |
2,192 |
0,044 |
| |
Normative influence (ref.: Negative or no action) |
|
|
| |
Positive |
2,266 |
0,096 |
| |
Mimetic influence (ref.: Negative or no action) |
|
|
| |
Positive |
1,605 |
0,093 |
| |
Receptivity (Ref.: Clinic without FMG or NC status that did not express the desire to become FMG or NC) |
|
|
| |
Clinic without FMG or NC that expressed the desire to become FMG or NC |
4,027 |
0,000 |
| |
NC |
10,056 |
0,000 |
| |
FMG |
16,116 |
0,000 |
| |
FMG-NC |
20,270 |
0,000 |
|
Contextual |
Coercive influence (proportion of clinics judging positive HSSC actions) |
0,081 |
0,028 |
| |
Normative influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of professional associations) |
-0,124 |
0,012 |
| |
Mimetic influence (proportion of clinics judging positive the influence of PHC organizations) |
0,038 |
0,244 |
| Receptivity (Proportion of receptive clinics) | -0,005 | 0,846 |
†Adjusted for ICIT score (2003), proportion of the population aged 65 and over, proportion of the population with low income, number of general practitioners per 100,000 inhabitants and avoidable mortality rates in the HSSC territory.
*Weighted by the number of FTE physicians in the clinic.