Table 5.
Regression Analyzes Using Profile Membership to Predicting Adolescents Adjustment
| Adolescent Adjustment - Wave 2 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internalizing | Externalizing | |||
| β | (SE) | β | (SE) | |
| Intercept | −0.06 | (.44) | 8.94*** | (.82) |
| Adjustment (Wave 1) | 0.21*** | (.03) | 0.41*** | (.05) |
| Mexican American (MA)a | 0.06 | (.14) | 0.38 | (.46) |
| Mexican Immigrant (MI)a | −0.08 | (.14) | 0.07 | (.47) |
| Socioeconomic status (SES) | −0.08 | (.07) | 0.10 | (.23) |
| Family Typeb | −0.01 | (.12) | 0.57 | (.34) |
| Adolescents’ Genderc | 0.20* | (.10) | −0.37 | (.33) |
| Affective-Controld | −0.07 | (.19) | 2.76** | (1.12) |
| Affective-Modeld | −0.20 | (.15) | 0.73† | (.40) |
| MA X Affective-Control | ||||
| MA X Affective-Model | ||||
| MI X Affective-Control | ||||
| MI X Affective-Model | ||||
| SES X Affective-Control | ||||
| SES X Affective-Model | ||||
| Family Type X Affective-Control | ||||
| Family Type X Affective-Model | 0.53* | (.24) | ||
| Gendera X Affective-Control | −2.93* | (1.38) | ||
| Gendera X Affective-Model | ||||
| R2 | 0.21*** | 0.29*** | ||
Note.
a
For fathers’ ethnic/immigrant background, 1=the ethnic/immigrant group mentioned (e.g. for Mexican American, 1= Mexican American), 0=European American.
b
Family type is 0 = intact 1 = stepfamily.
c
Adolescents’ Gender is 0 = sons 1 = daughters.
d
For fathers’ profile membership, 1=the profile mentioned (e.g. for Affective-Model, 1= Affective-Model), 0= Emotionally-Involved profile.
*
p < .05,
**
p < .01,
***
p < .001.