Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014 Jan 8;231(10):2159–2170. doi: 10.1007/s00213-013-3366-4

Table 1.

Post hoc contrasts for Phase 1 ANOVAs conducted separately for each concurrent schedule (a) or component (b) for lean and obese rats, with pellet type (CAR/CAR vs. SUC/SUC) as a between-subjects factor, and dose of rimonabant as a within-subjects factor. Significant contrasts are shown, which correspond to Figure 1 (a) and Figure 2 (b). Pellet type is omitted, as it was not found to be a significant factor in any analysis.

(a) Fig 1. Reinforcers by schedule
Programmed ratio Dose compared to vehicle F df p ηp2

Lean 5:1 schedule 10.0 mg/kg 12.7 (1,8) 0.008 0.61

1:5 schedule 3.0 mg/kg 5.88 (1,8) 0.042 0.42
10.0 mg/kg 16.34 (1,8) 0.004 0.67
Obese 5:1 schedule 10.0 mg/kg 19.23 (1,8) 0.002 0.71

1:5 schedule 10.0 mg/kg 78.53 (1,8) < 0.001 0.91
(b) Fig 2. Reinforcers by component
Programmed component Dose compared to vehicle F df p ηp2

Lean VI 12-s 10.0 mg/kg 13.84 (1,8) 0.006 0.63

VI 60-s 10.0 mg/kg 17.56 (1,8) 0.003 0.69
Obese VI 12-s 10.0 mg/kg 75.2 (1,8) < 0.001 0.9

VI 60-s 10.0 mg/kg 71.27 (1,8) < 0.001 0.9