Table 3.
Comparison of data recorded in parallel with the emEEG system and a NicoletOne V32 system
| Channel |
Examination room |
ICU |
Average | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subject 1 | Subject 2 | Subject 1 | Subject 2 | ||
|
P9 |
1.3 ± 1.6 |
1.3 ± 1.6 |
1.0 ± 1.4 |
1.4 ± 1.9 |
1.3 ± 1.6 |
|
F7 |
1.1 ± 1.3 |
0.9 ± 1.0 |
0.8 ± 0.8 |
0.9 ± 0.9 |
0.9 ± 1.0 |
|
Fp1 |
1.2 ± 1.5 |
0.9 ± 1.2 |
0.7 ± 1.0 |
1.1 ± 1.9 |
1.0 ± 1.4 |
|
Fp2 |
1.0 ± 1.1 |
0.7 ± 0.8 |
0.7 ± 0.9 |
0.7 ± 1.8 |
0.8 ± 1.1 |
|
F8 |
1.3 ± 1.7 |
0.8 ± 1.1 |
0.7 ± 0.9 |
1.0 ± 1.0 |
0.9 ± 1.2 |
|
P10 |
1.2 ± 1.5 |
1.2 ± 1.5 |
0.9 ± 1.2 |
1.2 ± 1.7 |
1.1 ± 1.5 |
| Average | 1.2 ± 1.4 | 1.0 ± 1.2 | 0.8 ± 1.0 | 1.1 ± 1.6 | 1.0 ± 1.3 |
The table displays the mean difference ± SD of the absolute difference signal computed from the EEGs recorded simultaneously with both systems (units: μV).