Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 10;65(9):2507–2520. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru141

Table 5.

Functional category enrichment of differentially expressed genes between wild-type LA1589 and MIR167 transgenic lines

MapMan BinCode Category Alla Commonb Uniquec Genomed P-valuef P-value (common) P-value (unique)
nume Freq num freq num freq num freq
Regulation of transcription 27.3.50 General transcription (GRF family) 4 (0) 0.57% 0 0 4 (0) 0.78% 31 0.09% 0.011 0.263 0.010
27.3.24 MADS box transcription factor family 7 (6) 0.99% 2 (1) 1.05% 5 (5) 0.97% 101 0.28% 0.016 0.060 0.039
27.3.4 Auxin response factor family 3 (2) 0.43% 2 (2) 1.05% 1 (0) 0.19% 26 0.07% 0.016 6.02E–03 0.138
27.3.40 Aux/IAA family 3 (3) 0.43% 1 (1) 0.52% 2 (2) 0.39% 25 0.07% 0.016 0.037 0.039
27.3.26 MYB-related transcription factor family 3 (1) 0.43% 0 0 3 (1) 0.58% 49 0.14% 0.059 0.332 0.039
27.3.21 GRAS transcription factor family 3 (0) 0.43% 0 0 3 (0) 0.58% 53 0.15% 0.069 0.340 0.047
27.3.35 bZIP transcription factor family 4 (3) 0.57% 2 (1) 1.05% 2 (2) 0.39% 82 0.23% 0.071 0.042 0.232
Cell wall 10.6 Cell wall degradation 10 (9) 1.42% 3 (3) 1.57% 7 (6) 1.36% 181 0.51% 0.016 0.060 0.039
10.8.1 Pectinesterases 6 (6) 0.85% 3 (3) 1.57% 3 (3) 0.58% 87 0.24% 0.016 0.012 0.111
10.1 Cell wall precursor synthesis 5 (4) 0.71% 2 (2) 1.05% 3 (2) 0.58% 68 0.19% 0.019 0.030 0.070
10.7 Cell wall modification 4 (4) 0.57% 3 (3) 1.57% 1 (1) 0.19% 81 0.23% 0.071 0.010 0.437
10.2 Cellulose synthesis 3 (3) 0.43% 2 (2) 1.05% 1 (1) 0.19% 66 0.19% 0.100 0.028 0.354
Transport 34.2 Transport of sugars 5 (2) 0.71% 2 (1) 1.05% 3 (1) 0.58% 80 0.23% 0.029 0.042 0.091
34.1 p- and v-ATPases 3 (3) 0.43% 2 (2) 1.05% 1 (1) 0.19% 62 0.17% 0.084 0.027 0.334
34.15 Potassium transport 3 (2) 0.43% 2 (1) 1.05% 1 (1) 0.19% 62 0.17% 0.084 0.027 0.334
Lipid metabolism 11.1 Fatty acid synthesis and elongation 7 (6) 0.99% 2 (2) 1.05% 5 (4) 0.97% 132 0.37% 0.029 0.100 0.060
11.8 Lipid metabolism (steroids, squalene etc) 6 (5) 0.85% 0 0 6 (5) 1.17% 114 0.32% 0.039 0.503 0.023
Hormone metabolism 17.6 Gibberellin 3 (1) 0.43% 2 (0) 1.05% 1 (1) 0.19% 53 0.15% 0.069 0.021 0.289
17.2.3 Auxin-induced-regulated- responsive-activated 7 (4) 0.99% 4 (2) 2.09% 3 (2) 0.58% 218 0.61% 0.140 0.032 0.479
Others 29.7 Protein glycosylation 6 (6) 0.85% 2 (2) 1.05% 4 (4) 0.78% 49 0.14% 6.6E–03 0.021 0.016
26.22 Short chain dehydrogenase/ reductase 7 (6) 0.99% 1 (1) 0.52% 6 (5) 1.17% 86 0.24% 0.011 0.169 0.011
30.6 MAP kinases 3 (3) 0.43% 3 (3) 1.57% 0 0 17 0.05% 0.011 1.24E–04 0.331
16.2 Phenylpropanoids metabolism. 10 (3) 1.42% 1 (0) 0.52% 9 (3) 1.75% 179 0.50% 0.016 0.340 0.011
26.6 O-methyl transferases 3 (3) 0.43% 3 (3) 1.57% 0 0 20 0.06% 0.016 1.66E–04 0.354
8 TCA 6 (6) 0.85% 6 (6) 3.14% 0 0 87 0.24% 0.016 6.39E–05 0.778
26.3 Gluco-, galacto- and mannosidases 5 (4) 0.71% 1 (1) 0.52% 4 (3) 0.78% 71 0.20% 0.022 0.131 0.039
5 Fermentation 3 (3) 0.43% 0 0 3 (3) 0.58% 32 0.09% 0.025 0.266 0.022
31.3 Cell cycle 7 (4) 0.99% 1 (1) 0.52% 6 (3) 1.17% 130 0.37% 0.028 0.263 0.039
na SUN-like proteins 3 (2) 0.44% 1 (1) 0.54% 2 (1) 0.40% 34 0.10% 0.028 0.055 0.060
21.2 Ascorbate and glutathione 4 (2) 0.57% 2 (1) 1.05% 2 (1) 0.39% 61 0.17% 0.038 0.027 0.144
24 Biodegradation of xenobiotics 4 (2) 0.57% 3 (1) 1.57% 1 (1) 0.19% 64 0.18% 0.042 6.02E-03 0.346
21.1 Thioredoxin 4 (4) 0.57% 0 0 4 (4) 0.78% 75 0.21% 0.060 0.423 0.039
26.28 GDSL-motif lipase 5 (5) 0.71% 4 (4) 2.09% 1 (1) 0.19% 112 0.32% 0.072 6.02E–03 0.571
19 Tetrapyrrole synthesis 3 (2) 0.43% 3 (2) 1.57% 0 0 58 0.16% 0.075 6.02E–03 0.641
26.2 UDP glucosyl and glucoronyl transferases 10 (10) 1.42% 7 (7) 3.66% 3 (3) 0.58% 338 0.95% 0.149 7.03E–03 0.778

P-values in bold indicate significant enrichment. a, All 687 differentially expressed genes between wild-type tomato and MIR167 transgenic lines. b, The 185 genes that were differentially expressed both owing to overexpression of MIR167 in tomato and in the Arabidopsis arf6 arf8 double mutant. c, The 502 differentially expressed genes unique in tomato. d, Number of genes in the GO category in the entire tomato genome. e, Numbers in the parentheses are the numbers of down-regulated genes. f, Hypergeometric tests were performed in R using ‘phyper’. FDR method was used for P-value correction.