Table 2.
Invasive Tumor Size a (cm) | DCIS Tumor Size (cm) | Invasive Tumor Grade a | Invasive Pathology Type | Original Presentation | Lymph Node Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
<0.1 | 4.5 | - | Microinvasiveb ductal | Nipple discharge | (-) |
<0.1 | 4.1 | - | Microinvasiveb ductal | Calcifications | (-) |
0.2 | 3.8 | II | Ductal | Calcifications | (-) |
0.2 | 0.5* | II | Ductal | Calcifications | (-) |
0.2 | 2* | - | Ductal | Palpable Mass | (+) |
0.3 | 6 | I | Ductal | Calcifications | (-) |
0.6* | 0.9 | II | Ductal & lobular | Calcifications | (-) |
0.8 | 2.8 | I | Ductal | Palpable Mass | (-) |
1.1 | 2 | II | Ductal | Calcifications | (-) |
1.3* | 9 | II | Ductal | Calcifications | (+) |
2.5 | 2.5 | II | Mixed lobular & ductal | Calcifications | (+) |
4 c | 6 | II | Ductal | Palpable Mass | (+) |
4 d | 8.1 | I | Ductal | Calcifications | (+) |
Several foci present, largest focus diameter reported.
Scarff-Bloom-Richardson grade
“Microinvasive” is defined as foci of invasion through the basement membrane measuring less than 1 mm.
Pathology required immunohistochemical studies to properly evaluate the case and establish the diagnosis of microinvasion throughout the region.
Imaging was compromised by foreign body injections into the breasts and pectoralis muscles.