Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Rev Cancer. 2011 Oct 24;11(11):775–791. doi: 10.1038/nrc3151

Table 3.

Clinical trials with combinations including FTIs*

Drugs Disease Phase Patients (median age) Clinical response and number of patients FT activity or prenylation Response rate (%) Other comments
Tipifarnib + capecitabine Advanced solid tumours I 41 (57) 5 PR and 11 SD FT ↓§ and HDJ2 ↓ 12.2 No correlation between FT ↓ and response
Tipifarnib + doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide Advanced breast cancer I and II 32 (51) 7 CR FT ↓ by 55–100% 21.9
Stage IIB–IIIC breast cancer II 44 (51) 11 CR Median FT ↓ by 91% 25
Tipifarnib + etoposide AML I 84 (77) 20 CR p-S6 ↓ 23.4
Tipifarnib + gemcitabine Advanced solid tumours I 19 (59) 2 PR HDJ2 ↓ 10.5
Tipifarnib + gemcitabine Advanced pancreatic cancer III 341 (61) 6 CR, 6 PR, 53 SD, and 28 PD and MD ND 1.8 MS: 193 days. 6-month survival: 53%. 1-year survival: 27%
347 (62) 8 CR, 8 PR, 52 SD, and 30 PD and MD ND 2.3 MS: 182 days. 6-month survival: 49%. 1-year survival: 24%
Tipifarnib + gemcitabine + cisplatin Advanced solid tumours I 27 (58) 1 CR and 8 PR Prelamin A ↓ 33.3
Advanced solid tumours I 31 (58) 8 PR and 12 SD ND 25.8 Phase II trial recommended
Tipifarnib + idarubicin + cytarabine AML and MDS I/II 95 (50) 61# CR and 9 PR ND 74 MS: 17 months
108 (52) 65# 70 MS: 13 months
Tipifarnib + imatinib CML I 25 (62) 17 PR ND 68 11 patients withdrew (lack of response)
Tipifarnib + irinotecan Solid tumours I 35 (52) 3 PR, 14 SD, and 13 PD and MD ND 8.6
Tipifarnib + letrozole Advanced breast cancer II 74 (60) 3 CR, 19 PR, 29 SD, and 23 PD and MD ND 29.7 No improvement by tipifarnib
39 (61) 1 CR, 14 PR, 15 SD, and 9 PD and MD ND 38.5
Tipifarnib + sorafenib Advanced solid tumours I 43 (56) 3 PR, 15 SD, and 20 PD and MD 25% of patients with >50% FT ↓ 7.0
Tipifarnib + tamoxifen Metastatic breast cancer I 12 (50) 2 PR and 1 SD FT ↓ 42–54% 16.7
Lonafarnib + carboplatin + paclitaxel Advanced NSCLC III 308 (unknown) NA NA OS: 144 days. TTP: 137 days
308 (unknown) NA OS: 168 days. TTP: 152 days
Lonafarnib + docetaxel Advanced solid tumours I 29 1 CR and 6 SD 3.4 Response (CR + SD) correlates with low FNTB mRNA levels
Lonafarnib + gemcitabine Advanced bladder cancer II 31 (64) 1 CR and 9 PR ND 32.3 MS: 11.5 months. TTP: 7 months
Lonafarnib + imatinib CML I 23 (55) 6 CR and 2 PR ND 34.7
Lonafarnib + paclitaxel Solid tumours I 21 (60) 6 PR ND 28.6 6 patients previously treated
BMS-214662 + cisplatin Advanced solid tumours I 23 (57) 15 SD Short-lived FT ↓ 0 No objective response
BMS-214662 + paclitaxel Advanced solid tumours I 26 (60) 2? PR Short-lived FT ↓ ≤7.7
BMS-214662 + paclitaxel + carboplatin Advanced solid tumours I 30 (58) 3 PR and 8 SD Short-lived FT ↓ and HDJ2 ↓ 10.0 No correlation between dose and HDJ2 ↓
L-778,123 + radiotherapy Advanced solid tumours I 7 (59) 5 CR, 1 PR, and 6 PD and MD ND 85.7 No RAS mutations
Advanced pancreatic cancer I 10 (59) 1 PR, 5 SD, and 4 PD and MD HDJ2 ↓ 10.0 3 out of 4 patients examined have KRAS mutations

AML, acute myeloid leukaemia; CML, chronic myeloid leukaemia; CR, complete response; FNTB, farnesyltransferase β-subunit; FT, farnesyltransferase; FTIs, FT inhibitors; GGTI, geranylgeranyltransferase 1 inhibitor; HI, haematological improvement; MD, metastatic disease; MDS, myelodysplastic syndrome; MS, median survival; NA, not applicable; ND, not determined; NSCLC, non-small-cell lung cancer; OS, overall survival; p, phosphorylated; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; S6, ribosomal protein S6; SD, stable disease; TTP, median time to progression.

*

See Supplementary information S5 (table) for a table with references. This table only considers FTIs because, to our knowledge, only one GGTI, GGTI-2418, is currently in clinical trials. Studies that did not evaluate tumour response are not included. Median ages are rounded to the closest integer. The number of evaluable patients is stated whenever possible. The response rate was calculated by dividing the sum of complete and partial responses by the number of evaluable patients.

PR includes haematological improvement.

§

Downward arrows indicate a reduction of enzyme activity (in the case of FT) or a reduction in farnesylation (in the case of HDJ2 or prelamin A).

This patient cohort received a placebo instead of the FTI.

This patient cohort received idarubicin plus cytarabine (referred to by the authors as a historical control).

#

As the reference only provides percentage response rates, the patient numbers were calculated.