Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cryo Letters. 2013 Jul-Aug;34(4):324–337.

Table 3.

Benchmarking results of the FE and FD simulators on a representative case of a cancerous prostate model. Cryoprobe layout is based on a bubble packing method (illustrate d in Fig. 4). For the FE simulator, a time step of the 60 sec represents an upper limit for convergence, whereas the 30 sec time step is deemed practical for concurrent defect region calculations. Time step for the FD simulator is taken at the stability li mit.

Simulator FE FD
Time step 60 sec 30 sec .02 sec
Minimum defect value 24.5% 24.7% 24.3%
Total simulated time 255 sec 255 sec 255 sec
Simulated time to minimum defect 180 sec 199 sec 255 sec
Actual runtime 1 core 613 sec 966 sec 144 sec
2 cores 423 sec 689 sec 83 sec
4 cores 304 sec 521 sec 67 sec
Simulated time ratio =
comp. runtime / procedure duration
1 core 236% 379% 56%
2 cores 165% 270% 32%
4 cores 119% 204% 26%