Table 3.
P-values for the pairwise comparisons of the level of prehension, total consumption, useful consumption and refusal for each product
| Product comparisons | Prehension | Total consumption | Useful consumption | Refusal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Ipakitine vs Renalzin |
0.6293 |
1.0000 |
0.0005* |
0.3383 |
|
Ipakitine vs Azodyl |
0.9207 |
0.0011* |
<.0001* |
0.7038 |
|
Ipakitine vs Rubenal |
0.1450 |
0.0786 |
0.0118* |
0.0076 |
|
Ipakitine vs Pronefra |
0.0023* |
<.0001* |
<.0001* |
<.0001* |
|
Renalzin vs Azodil |
0.7039 |
0.0011* |
0.0336* |
0.1838 |
|
Renalzin vs Rubenal |
0.3176 |
0.0786 |
0.2906 |
0.0784 |
|
Renalzin vs Pronefra |
0.0008* |
<.0001* |
<.0001* |
<.0001* |
|
Azodyl vs Rubenal |
0.1758 |
0.0900 |
0.0022* |
0.0026* |
|
Azodyl vs Pronefra |
0.0019* |
0.1088 |
0.0459* |
0.0002* |
| Rubenal vs Pronefra | <.0001* | 0.0013* | <.0001* | <.0001* |
Where products are significantly different, this is noted in bold with an asterisk.