Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 28.
Published in final edited form as: Atten Percept Psychophys. 2011 Nov;73(8):2413–2424. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0199-2

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

d′ as a function of set size for Experiment 1. Physical set size was changed in panel A, while an attentional cue was used to manipulate set size in panel B. In both cases, the detectability functions cross over each other, indicating that different decision rules are necessary to account for performance on the two stimuli. Display manipulation and search stimuli varied across blocks, while set size varied within blocks. Error bars represent within-subjects confidence intervals (Cousineau, 2005; Morey, 2008)