Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Feb 12;95(6):1076–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.022

Table 3.

Demographics, Injury Characteristics from Sensitivity Analyses

Sample Characteristics Examining those who were living and maintain a private residential status Examining those who had 15 or more years of follow-up

n (%)* n (%)*

In Sensitivity Analyses (N=1442) Dropped from Sensitivity Analyses (N=218) In Sensitivity Analyses (N=481) Dropped from Sensitivity Analyses (N=1179)
Age at injury, ±SD 32.8 ±13.7 44.9 ± 16.3 t(264.9+)=−10.40, p<0.0001 29.8 ± 12.3 36.2 ± 15.1 t(1082.4+)=9.00, p<0.0001
Male 1126 (78.1) 178(81.7) χ2(1)=1.43, p=0.23 385 (80.0) 919 (78.0) χ2(1)=0.89, p=0.35
Race (N missing 114) Minority 408 (28.3) 54(24.8) χ2 (1)=1.17, p=0.28 116 (24.1) 346 (29.4) χ2(1)=4.65, p=0.03
Motor-FIM at discharge from Rehab, ±SD 53.8 ±21.4 43.3 ±22.6 t(1658)=6.70, p<0.0001 57.7 ± 22.1 50.3 ± 21.4 t(1658)= −6.30, p<0.0001
Level/Severity at discharge (N missing 125) χ2 (3)=13.80, p=0.003 χ2(3)=8.23, p=0.04
 Paraplegia, incomplete 236(16.4) 25(11.5) 81 (16.8) 180 (15.3)
 Paraplegia, complete 488(33.8) 60(27.5) 173 (36.0) 375 (31.8)
 Tetraplegia, incomplete 429(29.8) 68(31.2) 120 (25.0) 377 (32.0)
 Tetraplegia, complete 289(20.0) 65(29.8) 107 (22.3) 247 (21.0)

+Satterthwaite method used due to unequal variances.