Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 May 29.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2013 Nov 21;58(22):8099–8120. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/8099

Table 3.

Results from comparison between FLUKA, 3D-RD and MCID DMC simulation in water. For Dprofile calculation, code 1 is represented by either 3D-RD or MCID and code 2 is represented by FLUKA.

Profile comparison (all the profiles) R inside the VOIs (all the profiles)
Dprofile ± SD Rave ± SD [Rmin, Rmax]
FLUKA versus 3D-RD (3.0 ± 2.4)% 1.01 ± 0.06 [0.9, 1.6]
FLUKA versus MCID (2.6 ± 2.1)% 1.01 ± 0.07 [0.8, 1.5]