Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 27;2014:868515. doi: 10.1155/2014/868515

Table 2.

The overall HIVIFNs of alternatives.

λ = 2 GHIVIFAWA (HIVIFAWA) GHIVIFNWG (HIVIFAWG)
y 1 {〈[0.3925,0.4601], [0.1712,0.2389]〉, 
〈[0.5376,0.5668], [0.2391,0.2700]〉}
{〈[0.3373,0.4415], [0.1971,0.2628]〉, 
〈[0.4788,0.5150], [0.2507,0.2896]〉}
y 2 {〈[0.5513,0.6545], [0.1359,0.2874]〉, 
〈[0.6113,0.7126], [0.1107,0.2874]〉}
{〈[0.4732,0.5731], [0.1537,0.3020]〉, 
〈[0.5990,0.6980], [0.1207,0.3020]〉}
y 3 {〈[0.5398,0.6427], [0.1517,0.2975]〉} {〈[0.4921,0.5911], [0.1884,0.3118]〉}
y 4 {〈[0.5929,0.6696], [0.1576,0.2440]〉, 
〈[0.6125,0.6905], [0.1751,0.2594]〉}
{〈[0.5880,0.6539], [0.2123,0.2698]〉, 
〈[0.4938,0.5348], [0.2016,0.2556]〉}