Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Psychosom Res. 2014 Mar 25;76(5):394–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.03.004

Table 4.

6-month weight loss in relation to weight loss progress evaluated at week 3 and a subsequent week of behavioral weight loss treatment among women with obesity and depression (N=75)

Weeks of treatment Weight loss not on target at either week 3 or later week, N (%) Se, % Sp, % Clinically significant weight loss at 6 months, by early-treatment weight loss
5% or greater weight loss at 6 months among those whose early-treatment weight loss was on target at week 3 and subsequent week, N (%) 5% or greater weight loss at 6 months among those whose early-treatment weight loss was not on target at either week 3 and/or subsequent week, N (%) Crude RR (95% CI) Adjusted RR (95% CI)
Weeks 3 & 4 39 (52) 65 66 21 (58) 11 (28) 2.07 (1.17–3.66) 1.82 (0.99–3.36)a
Weeks 3 & 5 41 (55) 70 66 21 (62) 11 (27) 2.30 (1.30–4.07) 2.30 (1.30–4.07)
Weeks 3 & 6 47 (63) 79 59 19 (68) 13 (28) 2.45 (1.45–4.16) 2.45 (1.45–4.16)
Weeks 3 & 7 47 (63) 79 59 19 (68) 13 (28) 2.45 (1.45–4.16) 2.85 (1.60–5.09)b
Weeks 3 & 8 50 (67) 86 59 19 (76) 13 (26) 2.92 (1.74–4.90) 2.92 (1.74–4.90)

Se: sensitvity, i.e., proportion of women failing to achieve 5% or greater weight loss at 6 months who were not on target with their weight loss at a given week early in treatment; Sp: specificity, i.e., proportion of women achieving 5% or greater weight loss at 6 months who were on target with their weight loss at a given week early in treatment.

a

Adjusted for education (graduate, bachelor’s, or HS/some college versus less than HS);

b

Adjusted for smoking (never versus former smoking).