Skip to main content
. 2004 May 1;328(7447):1046. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38048.506134.EE

Table 2.

Randomised trials on non-absorbable disaccharides versus antibiotics in treatment of patients with hepatic encephalopathy

No of patients randomised
Type of hepatic encephalopathy
Experimental/control intervention
No of patients without improvement/total
No of dropouts/total
Study design Quality* Experimental Antibiotics Experimental Antibiotics
Conn 19775
Crossover
High
33
Chronic
Lactulose + placebo/neomycin + sorbitol
3/18
2/15
None in 1st period
Atterbury 19786 Parallel High 47 Acute Lactulose + placebo/neomycin + sorbitol 4/23 4/24 1/23 1/24
Orlandi 198130 Parallel High 190 Acute + chronic Lactulose/neomycin + magnesium sulfate 63/91 48/82 17§
Russo 198931
Crossover
Low
15
Chronic
Lactulose/ribostamycin
1/8
2/7
Unknown
Blanc 199332 Parallel Low 60 Acute Lactitol/vancomycin 9/29 10/31 2/29 2/31
Bucci 199333
Parallel
Low
58
Unknown
Lactulose + placebo/rifaximin + sorbitol

Unknown
Fera 199334
Parallel
Low
40
Unknown
Lactulose + placebo/rifaximin + placebo
4/20
0/20
Unknown
Festi 199335
Parallel
Low
21
Chronic
Lactulose/rifaximin

Unknown
Massa 199336
Parallel
High
40
Chronic
Lactulose + placebo/rifaximin + sorbitol
2/20
0/20
Unknown
Song 200037 Parallel Low 64 Unknown Lactulose/rifaximin 7/25 8/39 1/25 1/39
Loguercio 200338 Parallel Low 27 Chronic Lactitol + placebo/rifaximin + placebo 11/13 6/14 3/13 2/14
Mas 200339 Parallel High 103 Acute Lactitol + placebo/rifaximin + placebo 12/53 10/50 7/53 8/50
*

Classified with adequate allocation concealment and adequate blinding as high quality.

Improvement defined as partial or complete resolution of clinical or subclinical symptoms of hepatic encephalopathy.

Experimental and control intervention reported to be equally effective but numerical data not available.

§

Exact number of dropouts in each intervention group not reported and accordingly it was not possible to perform intention to treat analysis for this trial.